EpicEng

64 ms·

661.
by EpicEng 7y ago
>most game studios would not be able to survive based on box sales alone. Where are you getting that? It's the basis of your entire argument and there's nothing to back it up. The loot box model is relatively new and we have a
662.
by EpicEng 7y ago
I don't see how you can substitute Paris or Rome with a nature hike. I enjoy a hike as much as the next guy, but I doubt I'll run into something like e.g. the Vatican on my journey
663.
by EpicEng 7y ago
Hardly an option for us with kids and jobs that can't easily be left. My wife is a school teacher, she can't take off for two weeks in October.
664.
by EpicEng 7y ago
It comes down to accepting VC money and the expectations that go along with it. Obviously a sustainable business is a great thing, but if you're taking millions from investors they want a return.
665.
by EpicEng 7y ago
Uh huh. I'll remember that the next time a ton of bricks falls on my head when passing a construction site. Do you have any reason to believe this is an actual, honest to God, widespread problem?
666.
by EpicEng 7y ago
If you're getting a drug test it's most likely because there are safety and insurance implications. Don't pretend like most of us are being randomly tested at work.
667.
by EpicEng 7y ago
Who ever said "vast majority"?
668.
by EpicEng 7y ago
Yeah, it's really hit or miss. I enjoyed my 320 page manuals written by cynical, hardened, life-worn EE's.
669.
by EpicEng 7y ago
For me, having come from robotics/digital imaging/signal processing and now doing web dev, I feel exactly this. My old problems were far more technical, but I could always form a complete mental model of what was happening. Now I
670.
by EpicEng 7y ago
>I worry about crime when it impacts the victims. I worry less about crime when there are no victims or when the victim does not feel the impact. MP has consistently lied to their customers about movie availability and made it extremely
671.
by EpicEng 7y ago
And what if you can't obtain that evidence because the person in possession won't hand it over? What if your only 'witness' is a corporate entity? What if your witness just doesn't like cops? Probably a hundred more
672.
by EpicEng 7y ago
Back in the real world of today, where one infected person can infect thousands more, if prefer my child not die of polio if it can be avoided.
673.
by EpicEng 7y ago
How do you envision that playing out? If the court has no power to compel testimony they have very little power in general.
674.
by EpicEng 7y ago
There are restrictions on how that amendment may be used, and ignoring a subpoena to testify against _someone else_ is not a valid use. Besides, she hasn't pled the fifth (because she can't as it makes no sense.)
675.
by EpicEng 7y ago
>Sorry but you are arguing that it will improve security. I'm asking you to prove that it does improve security My opinion on that bit isn't cemented in yet (why I used "likely"), but people are fooled by real-soundin
676.
by EpicEng 7y ago
It's not always 1-3 characters. google-payments.sbc.net for example. For the third time, I'm not arguing in favor of Google's implementation. What I'm saying is that this has nothing to do with Google being out of touch
677.
by EpicEng 7y ago
Like I said, I'm against it for several reasons, but I replied to this: >there seems to be a disconnect between the chrome devs and users
678.
by EpicEng 7y ago
Have they though? How many of their users understand what "www" or "https" mean? For those that have a vague idea, how many ever look? I don't like the change either, for a variety of reasons, but I don't think
679.
by EpicEng 7y ago
"everything works until it doesn't". That's true, but not terribly useful advice.
680.
by EpicEng 7y ago
At 0.9% you're better off sticking the extra money in an Ally savings account. That's basically free money at that rate; use it.
681.
by EpicEng 7y ago
Yes, if you don't have money to invest, you cannot invest. What's your point?
682.
by EpicEng 7y ago
Right, but it's why fixing it is not a priority.
683.
by EpicEng 7y ago
They probably assume that the vast majority of the population are not massive pedants and will do what they expect.
684.
by EpicEng 7y ago
In my experience, the problem with your thinking is that it doesn't play out that way. If management is open to criticism and will actually use that feedback to make changes, you probably realize that fact and have already been giving
685.
by EpicEng 7y ago
Most people who use StockX buy limited release sneakers that you can no longer get via retail. Prices go up and down depending on demand and scarcity (think eBay.) It may seem silly, but certain designs can go for a lot of money ($1,000+).
686.
by EpicEng 7y ago
Which FF dependencies do you think are unnecessary?
687.
by EpicEng 7y ago
>The Global Times reports that all was as normal and that her fans urged her to show her face and remove her filter but she refused, instead apparently saying: "I can't show my face until I receive gifts worth 100,000 yuan ($11
688.
by EpicEng 7y ago
>There is no trick without some mutual agreement on what will be given in return. Says who? You? Even though I think you're being purposely obtuse, here's the definition. >a cunning or skillful act or scheme intended to dece
689.
by EpicEng 7y ago
>What a hilarious spin on this. Are you implying they signed a contract or something? The fault is on the men who were stupid enough to send money to begin with. Agreed. They fell for her... trick. Why do you believe the two are mutually
690.
by EpicEng 7y ago
This woman is trying to trick men into sending her money. Don't be naive.

More ›