ElKowar

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by ElKowar 3y ago

   I've definitely considered it, and I do see the points of yuck either becoming a bad, turing complete lisp, or being just,... not powerful enough. However, I have two main counterpoints to the idea of turning it into a library for some
2. 2.▲
   by ElKowar 3y ago

   Superficially, it is similar to conky in concept, but with very different primary points of focus. whilst conky excells at having lots of info on your desktop in the background, eww might not be optimal for that. On the other hand, eww is g
3. 3.▲
   by ElKowar 3y ago

   Yes! It works both on X and on Wayland, and should support basically any DE, WM and compositor out there. Note that there are a few exceptions: As far as I'm aware, GNOME on wayland is not going to work well, as GNOME doesn't impl
4. 4.▲
   by ElKowar 3y ago

   Note that this is primarily a syntactical choice -- there isn't _currently_ much in the configuration language that actually resembles the functionality from regular lisp languages. I've been thinking quite a bit about how I could