Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ElFitz
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
151.
▲
by
ElFitz
6mo ago
> because size of the software industry is not that huge I onboarded marketing on a premium team Claude seat yesterday. And one of our sales vibecoded an internal tool in the last three weeks using Claude Code that they now use every day
152.
▲
by
ElFitz
6mo ago
It’s the tool that calls the model, give it access to the local file system, calls the actual tools and commands for the model, etc, and provide the initial system prompt. Basically a clever wrapper around the Anthropic / OpenAI /
153.
▲
by
ElFitz
6mo ago
Thanks!
154.
▲
by
ElFitz
6mo ago
15? Per month? What’s even the point?
155.
▲
by
ElFitz
6mo ago
Yes, but once everything has been deployed through their web UI or the cli command, and fine-tuned over the weeks and months as kinks get ironed out, how do you port it all to your own? Nothing insurmontable or even complex; just laborious.
156.
▲
by
ElFitz
6mo ago
> See: literally every thread discussing a Claude outage or change of some kind. “Opus is absolutely incredible, it’s one shotting work that would take me months” immediately followed by “no it’s totally nerfed now, it can’t even impleme
157.
▲
by
ElFitz
6mo ago
I am curious, what do people use Cognito for? I’ve never not ended up regretting using it.
158.
▲
by
ElFitz
6mo ago
> Not because I can't see a use-case for them, but because I have 0 trust in them > […] > Put another way, LLM companies are trying to climb the ladder to be a platform, I have zero interest in that, I was a "dumb pipe&qu
159.
▲
by
ElFitz
6mo ago
> The surface for security vulnerabilities also gets narrower, since you "only" have to trust the LLM (which is still a huge ask, but still better than LLM + 1 random person). On top of which, any such vulnerabilities will be m
160.
▲
by
ElFitz
6mo ago
Same. Will run it too when I next get it.
161.
▲
by
ElFitz
6mo ago
Smith-Waterman Sequence Alignment applied to tool calls. Tool calls are encoded as single characters (Read=R, E=Edit, B=Bash,…), with interesting differences between "successful" and "struggling" sessions. Another one is
162.
▲
by
ElFitz
6mo ago
Mostly playing around with AI agents session logs. Lately I’ve been having LLMs implement multiple analysis methods on my session transcripts, trying to surface and identify patterns. It’s been interesting. It took quite a bit of nudging, b
163.
▲
by
ElFitz
6mo ago
Personally, I’ve had "maintenance" and "auditing" sessions successfully drop notes in a my loop’s "inbox" directory (even though it was intended for my use). I’d say that works as a simple initial approach. Sec
164.
▲
by
ElFitz
6mo ago
Yeah, that's pretty much the lines I was thinking along. Perhaps use codex for planning / reviews, but otherwise go with z.ai / minimax for actual implementation. Thanks!
165.
▲
by
ElFitz
6mo ago
pi is what OpenClaw runs on, and so far OpenAI seems committed to it. No telling how long it will last.
166.
▲
by
ElFitz
6mo ago
> but right now it works so much better to experiment and try new approaches and prompts and flows, and pi is the easiest one to tweak and make it your own. That’s what really appeals to me. I’ve been fighting Claude Code’s attempts to p
167.
▲
by
ElFitz
6mo ago
Has anyone (other than OpenClaw) used pi? ( https://shittycodingagent.ai/ , https://pi.dev/ ) Any insights / suggestions / best practices?
168.
▲
by
ElFitz
6mo ago
Should be doable with worktrees. Claude Code has a flag for that, others probably do too.
169.
▲
by
ElFitz
6mo ago
> After done, review the code. You will notice there is always something to fix. Hardcoded variables, a sql migration with seed data that should actually not be a migration, just generally crazy stuff. > > The worst is that the AI
170.
▲
by
ElFitz
6mo ago
> it's about the European corporations moving off Azure to some other cloud solution offered by European corporations (do we even have any?). Scaleway and OVH? Although I’m not sure how they compare at scale to AWS / Azure 
171.
▲
by
ElFitz
6mo ago
It still strikes me that some places consider someone fully able to freely consent to enrol in the army, to the risk of getting permanently maimed or mentally scarred, and consider them fit to make life or death split-second decisions for b
172.
▲
by
ElFitz
6mo ago
Nothing to do with infantilizing anyone. I’m probably stating the obvious, but some things are complex and don’t have good universal solutions. Which is part of why we have judges and lawyers, not just laws.
173.
▲
by
ElFitz
6mo ago
> Within the current way we do things, whatever age you pick is the age the transition period starts for a big fraction of people. My point precisely. Many people only start experiencing life as adults once they’ve been declared adults.
174.
▲
by
ElFitz
6mo ago
> Age isn't an issue when all parties are adults. I wouldn’t fully agree. All parties being adults doesn’t inherently remove the advantage very large age and experience gaps can give to one party over the other, especially when one
175.
▲
by
ElFitz
6mo ago
I’ve been thinking about using LLMs as a sort of proxy, for both dial-up and bad phone networks. Theoretically, such a service could allow you to "browse" even via SMS. I mean, it’s a bit ridiculous to have to resort to that, but
176.
▲
by
ElFitz
7mo ago
My favourite so far was Claude "fixing" deployment checks with `continue-on-error: true`
177.
▲
by
ElFitz
7mo ago
Our sales and marketing have started making their own tools for themselves. This week . They actually launched a terminal. They hit a wall with deployment, for now, but it’s amusing to watch. And since I wouldn’t trust their stuff (or Clau
178.
▲
by
ElFitz
7mo ago
> What value is left to provide for users? Everything and anything people actually want or need, whether it’s every day or just for five minutes, that nobody else could be bothered to make. Today most won’t know what to do with it, just
179.
▲
by
ElFitz
7mo ago
Iterative multi-agent and multi-model processes are fun.
180.
▲
by
ElFitz
7mo ago
Why would the synthesis round get expensive than the regular rounds? > and quickly realized throwing 5 mediocre models at a problem just makes them argue in circle. What was your selection strategy? My current issue is more that the more
More ›