Eji1700

16 ms·

181.
by Eji1700 3y ago
They absolutely should. They won't, but they should. A lot of the modern megacorps basically made their money by ignoring laws that were put in place to prevent farming the younger generation, and yet here we are.
182.
by Eji1700 3y ago
I'm well aware, and it's purposefully ignoring that the video is not bringing up anything new, nor were the authors beliefs new. It's implying that they would not have come to the same conclusions when it's just not tru
183.
by Eji1700 3y ago
I find it amusing how many people like you didn't notice the large amount of people bringing up all the points that this video made on the first day, as justification for why they doubted the hell out of this claim.
184.
by Eji1700 3y ago
> It's easy call those claims nonsense in retrospect. People were calling out the over hyping, the bad science, and the bad graph from day 1. The original scientists DIDN'T want to publish. Almost all important discoveries hav
185.
by Eji1700 3y ago
We had similar nonsense with r the EM Drive and cold fusion so this isn’t that new. Either way the best video I’ve seen on this whole thing, Abe why it’s endlessly frustrating, is this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zl-Agm
186.
by Eji1700 3y ago
I sincerely doubt anyone will see this, but this video is basically a perfect breakdown of everything wrong with how this was handled- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zl-AgmoZ5mo
187.
by Eji1700 3y ago
Which was back when you had a bunch of options. If firefox goes under and chromium throws up, it's not like there's a large field of choices.
188.
by Eji1700 3y ago
I said associated for a reason. Personally I think most "smart" fields have about the same ratio of morons as any other.
189.
by Eji1700 3y ago
This take is even more baffling to me than the original question.
190.
by Eji1700 3y ago
I'm honestly not sure if you're joking but in case you're not, the "minimum viable size" is hardly the largest issue with what you're proposing and it sounds like you're not getting what the key issues are
191.
by Eji1700 3y ago
I mean they weren't quiet, just drowned out. There's this mindset of trusting dreams/drama/personalities more than verifiable processes, and as communities like HN have shown, even people in fields associated with better
192.
by Eji1700 3y ago
Mostly, they don't? There should be more funding in this area, but at some point you've got to build it, and that takes a ton of time. Regulations/bureaucracy could be better but at the end of the day you're not going t
193.
by Eji1700 3y ago
Eh. It's more a correction caused by over globalization. Too many theorists decided to claim that "no one would ever risk their economy!" and since it made lines go up globally everyone bought in. Then Russia invaded Ukrain
194.
by Eji1700 3y ago
Well to throw it out there, I disagree with the article author's pessimism and most of your beliefs as well? I think AI is going to be a very very mixed bag and mostly encourage even more obnoxious behaviors/practices as it'
195.
by Eji1700 3y ago
This is such a weird example to me, mostly because I've yet to come across a language that doesn't have awkward gotchas, and that one is one of the easiest ("ah yeah...= is only assignment in a let..weird"). The article
196.
by Eji1700 3y ago
It also ignores the reality that there's some level of conservative who's not really represented right now. I've known people who straight up left the party after voting red their entire lives because of Trump. They, sincere
197.
by Eji1700 3y ago
It's because people aren't excited about the science. They're excited about the speculation, the gossip, and the potential result. That is literally antithetical to the entire process of proper science, and the exact kind o
198.
by Eji1700 3y ago
LK-99 and the UFO hearings have just tanked my already low opinion of so many communities. I know that no matter the field or the training people are susceptible to being overly excited when they're ignorant on a subject, but god it b
199.
by Eji1700 3y ago
I do not mean this in a hostile way, but I fucking hate this take. There are plenty of people who get EXTREMELY excited when shit turns out to be true. There's this sterotype of boring serious people who never have fun and don't
200.
by Eji1700 3y ago
The responses to this comment illustrate how badly such things are needed. What's so frustrating about all of it, is I agree heavily with the sentiment, but it's like saying a house is badly built because the sky is too heavy. No
201.
by Eji1700 3y ago
Because it's as well documented and supported as God.
202.
by Eji1700 3y ago
Who also somehow are aware of the location of earth, it having life, haven't made themselves known, and have only been seen in a way the governments can hush up (all of them).
203.
by Eji1700 3y ago
What if god is real (or gods, or whatever)? That's what this all boils down to. It's the exact same line of logic. Sure there could be an omnipotent all powerful being that just chooses to stay hidden from us for no provable, ob
204.
by Eji1700 3y ago
My comment is based on the current understanding of physics and the odds of some creature capable of defying that being able to even be hidden. I would love for us to find evidence of life in the universe which is why I despise this charade
205.
by Eji1700 3y ago
> Not only eyewitness accounts, but also recorded military footage (e.g. onboard cameras, FLIR sensors mentioned in the hearing). Are you suggesting that numerous high-ranking former military officials are lying under oath? And that the
206.
by Eji1700 3y ago
> The US and the USSR had to collaborate on filtering out UAPs from radar early warning systems so we didn't nuke each other. And as we know they're the only countries with radar and observation abilities. > Two of the peopl
207.
by Eji1700 3y ago
This whole thing is just making me have less and less faith in society. There's no fucking way this is remotely true, but everywhere I look, not matter the community, there's so much "what if" nonsense that reeks of the
208.
by Eji1700 3y ago
That’s the problem. Spending years to fail in research shouldn’t nuke your career. Finding out it’s not worth doing is as, if not more, important as finding the way to do it
209.
by Eji1700 3y ago
> How harmful is it really? You seem to assume it's negative information about people. If it decides to say that some quack hocking raw almonds as cancer cures is FDA approved it's extremely harmful. Hopefully it's not th
210.
by Eji1700 3y ago
Well the old joke is that it was easier to make Unix user friendly than to make windows work.

More ›