4 ms·
> The US and the USSR had to collaborate on filtering out UAPs from radar early warning systems so we didn't nuke each other. And as we know they're the only c
by Eji1700 3y ago
> The US and the USSR had to collaborate on filtering out UAPs from radar early warning systems so we didn't nuke each other.
And as we know they're the only countries with radar and observation abilities.
> Two of the people testifying in front of Congress are ex military pilots noting that they saw, and logged on radar, objects.
> The third has stated specifically that we do have satellite data and imagery displaying UAPs.
This is nothing new. There's plenty of "stuff" that can get tagged as a UAP/UFO/Whatever. None of it has turned out to be aliens.
> UFO reports from the middle ages exist, both in paintings and in writings. Ship captains have reports in their logs from the 16 and 1700s. Reports from within the U.S. in the 1800s exist.
We've also got reports of dragons, krakens, bigfoot, the lochness, ghosts, psychic powers, and magic. Hell there's a couple of rather popular books talking about all sorts of phenomena like talking burning bushes, parting the sea, and walking on water.
> All arguments of the form "where is the evidence" are moot at this point, as there is a mountain of evidence.
No, it just isn't. HARD EVIDENCE does not exist. Even a mild dive into the claims shows how absurd all of these are, and often very real explanations are given, verified, and ignored by the community that wants to believe. It's got all the rigor of pizzagate and is in fact less likely to be possible.
- BobbyJo 3y ago> And as we know they're the only countries with radar and observation abilities. They're not? Are you implying that by pointing out one event I'm explicitly excluding the possibility of others? Not sure that follows. > This is nothing new. There's plenty of "stuff" that can get tagged as a UAP/UFO/Whatever. None of it has turned out to be aliens. Depends on who you ask, which was kin of my entire point. There is tons of evidence, what missing is provenance. > We've also got reports of dragons, krakens, bigfoot, the lochness, ghosts, psychic powers, and magic. Hell there's a couple of rather popular books talking about all sorts of phenomena like talking burning bushes, parting the sea, and walking on water. Again, the was my point. I wasn't saying "here is all the 100% proven evidence". I was saying "there is no evidence" is an inaccurate statement. > No, it just isn't. HARD EVIDENCE does not exist There is plenty of material, with plenty of seals of approval, just not from the U.S. gov.