Eddy_Viscosity2

5 ms·

61.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 2mo ago
Whoever pays for them most likely. Also likely that there will some special layer of watermarking capability only the sec agencies get to use (and pay more for).
62.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 2mo ago
These are valid things to be unhappy about and should be corrected. But if the implication is 'licensing has issues so we'd be better off without' then I'm not on board. It reads like one of those 'if we can't
63.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 2mo ago
If other AI vendors don't follow suit, then people will move over to them to escape detection. Then of course Claude will stop watermarking.
64.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 2mo ago
I wonder how far we are away from AI being required to link to the TPM in a way that the OS and hardware people can have full authority on what you can use.
65.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 2mo ago
I opened with saying the article was interesting, but I still feel a deep sense of revulsion when I see LLM-isms like this. I will continue to call them out because I want them to stop and I don't have any other way to vent about it. I
66.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 2mo ago
Interesting, but I got to this: "Pricing cut-to-length tube is not "price per pound times pounds." It's a one-dimensional bin packing problem, and the details are where the money hides." which is one of the a peak L
67.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 2mo ago
This is the first and only use-case for LLMs that I am genuinely excited about.
68.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 2mo ago
Billionaires tell people to vote with their dollars because they will always have more votes then them.
69.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 2mo ago
I'm referring to the pattern of SCOTUS making up whatever justification they want to achieve the result they want. That and the pattern of being pro-corporation.
70.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 2mo ago
If the constitutional aspects are settled in favor of people, but current SCOTUS suggests this be unlikely. But.. even it were, then police departments would just buy the data second hand instead via direct contracts.
71.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 2mo ago
The US could vote its way out of all this surveillance nonsense and add some new privacy rights. But it won't.
72.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 2mo ago
Manuals don't always well explain how to use their products with everybody else's products because there are too many to do that. But there are lots of people trying things out and might figure out the fine details on how to make
73.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 2mo ago
That future version of Claude will still be mediated by an error prone human who in this case would be a non-engineer. So even if Claude is not error prone, it could be giving correct answers to the wrong questions and correct designs for
74.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 2mo ago
Sounds like the who age verification debate will just solve itself. Just wait until there aren't any more children and then we don't need to worry about protecting them.
75.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 2mo ago
> What happens if you convince consumers AI is bad I get this isn't your primary point, but this line suggests people would have otherwise thought AI was good if it wasn't for some devious party convincing them otherwise. This
76.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 2mo ago
> Companies should be doing their own training for their jobs, and university can be freed up to actually be about intellectual pursuit rather than economic pursuit. This would be great of course, but the reason that 'what actually
77.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 3mo ago
These kinds of tax breaks are a form of legalized fraud, imho. These tech companies absolutely have profit margins enough to pay taxes in full. Reducing their taxes while all the other business and property owners have to pay the full rate
78.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 3mo ago
It depends on what the land is developed for of course. 'Something' is not always better than 'nothing. I'm sure you can imagine land being developed in a way that is a net negative to the local community and economy.
79.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 3mo ago
> Taxes are calculated individually and are independent of one another. They are not independent. Total tax revenue is the key metric and it is sum of the individual components. If that value is not large enough taxes go up or services g
80.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 3mo ago
Nothing happens, is what happens.
81.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 3mo ago
Sternly? Hey hey hey, let's not go overboard here.
82.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 3mo ago
> I have never seen them randomly arresting someone for no reason. The 'for no reason' is doing a lot of work here I think. The reason might be that they didn't like the person's attitude, the person was annoying (but
83.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 3mo ago
Currency interventions never work. They buy a bit of time maybe, but without any fixes to the underlying causes that made the intervention necessary, its a temporary solution.
84.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 3mo ago
This is just the next generation of 'copaganda', where the just make their own media direct to the public. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copaganda
85.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 3mo ago
The police have an enormous amount of power in the system. They can unilaterally decide to let people get away with something illegal, or arrest people for doing something fully legal because they felt like it. And even if prosecutors drop
86.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 3mo ago
It's can also be circumvented entirely.
87.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 3mo ago
If you let a manager, accountant, or politician decide what 'unnecessary', 'wrong', and 'bad' are. Then I would agree. But if you let an artist decide those things, then I think it would be fine.
88.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 3mo ago
For model train sets, its often the cheapest most common ones that become the most valuable decades later. The expensive sets were cared for and so many survived, but the cheap ones were played with and tossed into the bin and then few surv
89.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 3mo ago
And this effects how ads are displayed on the main console how?
90.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 3mo ago
In work, once you remove all that is unnecessary, wrong, and bad. Then what you are left with must be greatness.

More ›