EMIRELADERO

8 ms·

91.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
The Copyright Office is not an authority in this context, it's just an opinion. They did not make any "finding". To a judge they may as well be any other amicus curiae . My opinion on the matter at hand is this: Artists who
92.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
My point is that the kind of IP at issue in this post and discussion is copyright, not personality rights. If we're talking about the views of the copyright office and how that relates to artists, it's implicit that we're sta
93.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
That's just an analog in an opinion, it's not binding. Also, that's just a new IP term then, but we were talking about copyright, not any abstract form of IP. Again, show me an example where an artist's style was used fo
94.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
That has nothing to do with IP, it's a personality rights claim. The decision explicitly refuses to involve Copyright, saying that voices (and by proxy the styles) are not copyrightable. What mattered there were specific rights of publ
95.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
No it's not? Style has been ruled pretty specifically to be uncopyrightable. Perhaps you could show me some examples?
96.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
The question is: would that disagreement have the same basis as the news above? I don't think so. Artists that are against GenAI take that stance out of a perceived abstract unfairness of the situation, where the AI companies aren&#x27
97.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
> To produce yet another analogy, imagine I have a service X. You can pay and I will give you any movie you want. You don’t know how I do it. Is this copyright infringement or not? I would say yes. Now let’s say I reveal the secret - I o
98.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
> Part of my point is that you don't need to produce literally equivalent output. Again, if I record and compress "Revenge of the Sith", there's literally zero pixels shared between my recording and the actual movie.
99.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
> The only reason we're even really entertaining this is because people continually draw parallels to humans. You see, it's not stealing from Getty. It's more like if someone saw Getty Images and then went out and took a p
100.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
Then the results would be the same, and it would still be fair use. I have yet to see an example that demonstrates LLMs plagiarize by default or by tendency. Your causality seems to be inverted here. You seem to be implying that "learn
101.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
You're thinking about it using the wrong framework IMO. It's not about the program's rights, it's about the human's rights to use the program. Not the machine's right to do something, but the human's right
102.
Breaking Free from Neural Networks and Dynamical Systems(lifeiscomputation.com)
1 points by EMIRELADERO 1y ago|0 comments
103.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
Hey! I should have phrased that differently, sorry! I actually followed the lawsuit as it was progressing, even listening to the oral arguments as soon as they were uploaded to the Ninth Circuit's YT channel. Such a shame...
104.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
Want something even more evil? I got you. When saurik sued Apple for antitrust reasons over Cydia[1] (which sadly ended up going nowhere), at some point a hearing was held where his lawyer accidentally read out something that was supposed t
105.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
I'm guessing that what GP meant with "dictatorial" was along the lines of the power you describe being wielded in a specific manner. To put it differently: a state of affairs where the Executive/President has those power
106.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
Why do you think that it would be impossible to make a society where a) everyone gets to live like a king, unconditionally, from birth to death, and b) people have the freedom to do and pursue what they want? I don't see "some % o
107.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
Could you give some examples/directions for interesting things that have popped up in the period you're mentioning? Sounds like a fun time.
108.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
A mixture of many architectures. LLMs will probably play a part. As for other possible technologies, I'm most excited about clone-structured causal graphs[1]. What's very special about them is that they are apparently a 1:1 algori
109.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
A fun little bit of trivia: Mammalian brains implement Gabor filters in the primary visual cortex (V1), as the first step of the visual processing pipeline.
110.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
At least for listening purposes, there's no difference between 44.1 KHz/16-bit sampling and anything above that. It's all the same to the human ear.
111.
by EMIRELADERO 2y ago
> The LLM can't describe it, it doesn't see inside itself, however, it has many textbooks in its training dataset, so it will grab an answer from these textbooks because that's how people answer. EDIT: I see now that you w
112.
Learning produces an orthogonalized state machine in the hippocampus(nature.com)
2 points by EMIRELADERO 2y ago|0 comments
113.
by EMIRELADERO 2y ago
> I understand Sergey Brin/et al had a grandiose goal for DeepMind via their Atari games challenge - but why not try alternate methods - say build/tweak games to be RL-friendly? Because the ultimate goal (real-world visual inte
114.
by EMIRELADERO 2y ago
That depends entirely on whether you believe understanding requires consciousness. I believe that the type of understanding demonstrated here doesn't. Consciousness only comes into play when we become aware that such understanding has
115.
by EMIRELADERO 2y ago
As someone who generally opposes Bukele on an ideological level, I'm not even that mad about the mass sweeps themselves. The way things were going before, it was obvious a drastic solution was needed. It's the CECOT conditions and
116.
by EMIRELADERO 2y ago
You could say one follows the other on a large enough scale.
117.
by EMIRELADERO 2y ago
That was an extreme example to illustrate the concept. My point is that reduced/little creativity (which is what the current models have) is not indicative of a total lack of intelligence.
118.
by EMIRELADERO 2y ago
That's creativity, not intelligence. LLMs can be intelligent while having very little (or even none at all) creativity. I don't believe one necessarily requires the other.
119.
by EMIRELADERO 2y ago
While certainly not human-level intelligence, I don't see how you could say they don't have any sort of it. There's clearly generalization there. What would you say is the threshold?
120.
by EMIRELADERO 2y ago
RLHF != RL

More ›