EMIRELADERO

7 ms·

61.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
Something the tweet doesn't mention is that the leak may have come from Intel: https://github.com/tongzx/nt5src/blob/daad8a087a4e75422ec96b...
62.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
It's DMCA abuse because that process is only legal to use in case of actual copyright infringement, not just any content you might have a moral claim over. You can see on the email that the "Original work" field is just a lin
63.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
As an aside, here's a relevant video about the (sometimes not) chaotic nature of double pendulums: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtjb2OhEQcU
64.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
Relevant: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cY6Y4lE3LTo
65.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
Thanks, but it's not my channel! I just stumbled upon it and made a mental note to remember the repo.
66.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
Holy shit, going to the official page[1], there's something that is somehow even worse than the loss of freedom: "You'll need to prove you own your apps by providing your app package name and app signing keys." That is c
67.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
So that's it then. If this actually goes through, there will be no option in the mobile OS market for an OS that both: a) allows the installation of apps without any contractual relationship with any party, and b) allows the use of mai
68.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
True! Thanks for pointing that out.
69.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
I don't see how your explanation leads to consciousness not being a thing. Consciousness is whatever process/mechanisms there are that as a whole produce our subjective experience and all its sensations, including but not limited
70.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
If you're ok with C++ you can try https://github.com/2swap/swaptube
71.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
You shouldn't need any laws, because it can be argued that by paying for the vehicle the owner purchased actual functionality, not just bare parts and chips. Any post-sale agreement is therefore inherently suspect from the beginning. I
72.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
Saved. Thanks for that belly laugh.
73.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
You're not missing anything. The Anthropic and Meta judges simply disagreed with each other and issued two opposite holdings.
74.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
> I don't know if they have a good case to demand specific performance from a different company in order to do that for them. I mean, this new company pushed the lockout update and imposed the new terms. If we already assume that th
75.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
> The second company bought servers that are connected to devices where users have all clicked through a EULA which likely says that they can change it whenever the heck they want. And that EULA is potentially unconscionable, both proced
76.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
The illegality lies on the fact that the product was advertised as having certain functionality on its own. > Typically most cloud products outline in their terms that services and their features may change it at any point. The user boug
77.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
> I just don’t understand why anyone here is surprised. Are they? To me it looks like legitimate complaints and only that. > Nor is there really anything unique about artificial proprietary lock-in when it comes to services. As a busi
78.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
The point is that the dependency is artificial. The user you responded to said it wasn't sold as a service, as it had local functionality that was removed post-sale. The customer didn't buy access to a service with a physical prod
79.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
Seconded. I don't know much about the code, but on a usability level it sometimes feels even more polished and pleasing to handle than many big proprietary offerings. I would go so far as to say it's one of the best executed deskt
80.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
> If you’re not happy with the Apple products or the value you’re getting from them, then simply stop buying them or making apps for them. You don’t have to use an iPhone. You’re welcome to use any Android based phone you’d like and inst
81.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
> Well, it's their platform and they're entitled to profit from it as they're pleased. Even the European Commission admitted that as well, because saying otherwise is akin to confiscating their intellectual property. It is
82.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
> The Original iPhone didn’t have any apps and Apple later created their own ecosystem with an end user agreement which supersedes the ads. The whole "user agreement" thing is one of the biggest problems, because it means Apple
83.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
All arguments invoking privacy and security coming from Apple when faced with loss of control over the iDevice software aftermarket should be discarded as nothing more than bad faith excuses. Why am I being so absolutist? Well, because we
84.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
The greatest gem is found in the footnote, IMO > "They managed to convince the courts that iPadOS is a separate operating system to iOS (it's not), which delayed iPadOS being designated as a gatekeeper for almost a year. They a
85.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
Somehow, Android manages to do it. Not only for browsers; all apps have JIT access without any entitlement/review needed. It doesn't seem like the average Android user is worse-off because of that, security-wise.
86.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
Wow. Now there's a quote: > "Youngsters who are immersed in this popular culture are accustomed to large doses of passive, visual entertainment. They tend to develop a short attention span, and expect immediate gratification. T
87.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
I agree with everything you said except for the last paragraph. The people who, according to your theory, want to reverse the tolerance trend and slide towards fascism/authoritarianism didn't pop out today. They existed and lived
88.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
Just to chime in: it's entirely possible and not at all contradictory to believe in human rights and other base ideals/"moral axioms" while being a secular materialist. The only difference is in where the belief is justi
89.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
That may be true, but this is the first example I've seen where the concept is successfully implemented in a noticeable way. It's just like image generation: the first iteration is the worst it will ever be.
90.
by EMIRELADERO 1y ago
How common is it for a SaaS company that isn't an old-enterprisey type to use third-party proprietary code in their business logic? I associated that phenomenon much more with standard installable PC software, especially the type to us

More ›