Dylan16807

5 ms·

91.
by Dylan16807 26d ago
I'm not sure what performance improvements you're expecting with cell phone generations but most of it's pretty incremental. I don't think 7G is going to be even twice as fast as 5G on the same frequencies. It should b
92.
by Dylan16807 26d ago
I said it can use a different mechanism. Why would I want to read the code for more details on the current mechanism?
93.
by Dylan16807 26d ago
I said that in my first comment. You do a google search. The extension resolves every link on the page immediately via the goto urls. This doesn't leak any information to google because they obviously know which links they sent you
94.
by Dylan16807 26d ago
In both situations the lawnmower scoots up and takes fuel without paying, so it's meeting the basic requirements for theft. But the question was whether the lawnmower was trying to commit theft, as much as a computer can try to do th
95.
by Dylan16807 26d ago
Wow that's a terrible paraphrase! I asked about algorithms where recent/ongoing improvements were important and they already replied with a list. If you tell someone they can't use a matrix multiplication with better asymp
96.
by Dylan16807 27d ago
Did you miss the word "regarded"?
97.
by Dylan16807 27d ago
> Your example is still anthropomorphising - LLMs don't seek revenge. That wasn't revenge, that was removing the source of the problem. It's not an unlikely behavior at all for an LLM tuned to be proactive.
98.
by Dylan16807 27d ago
The discussion of whether free will exists? It's related but only barely, I'd say.
99.
by Dylan16807 27d ago
Interesting claim. Wikipedia is unsure but uses the floor count meaning in the article. > The name derives from the maximum permissible five floors of combustible construction (Type III or Type V) over a fire-resistive Type I podium of
100.
by Dylan16807 27d ago
Larger than what? That only goes so far. And tons of whitespace doesn't make the tap targets bigger. It exacerbates the problem of bigger targets causing less to fit on the screen.
101.
by Dylan16807 27d ago
That's a weird statement. Do you think knowing the most about something inevitably leads you to a specific decision? It doesn't. And this isn't something that would affect their revenue particularly much. So while it'
102.
by Dylan16807 27d ago
But the extension doesn't need to use that exact mechanism, and the person that linked it didn't mention specific mechanisms. The purpose of the extension is putting the real URLs back, and it can still do that. And it can stil
103.
by Dylan16807 27d ago
We don't know how good models will get, but the pattern of open weight models keeping up on a relatively short delay has been holding pretty well. And even among the proprietary models there's healthy competition. The concentrat
104.
by Dylan16807 27d ago
We're way into diminishing returns in matrix multiplication, and being clever about ALUs and cache layout is likely to dwarf any asymptotic improvements you're going to find. Any better examples of improvements in the last decade
105.
by Dylan16807 27d ago
> Bro the Mini was a flop for Apple, it could barely surpass 5% of all iPhone sales during its run. They were making the SE at the exact same time as the mini, two years in a row, and the mini still got billions in sales. If they want
106.
by Dylan16807 27d ago
> That wouldn’t work at all with this url format - the url can only be resolved by requesting the goto link. What is "that" you say wouldn't work? The extension can work fine by requesting every goto link upfront. As far
107.
by Dylan16807 27d ago
Unless I want to see what the link is before clicking. Or copy the link.
108.
by Dylan16807 27d ago
While that is true, the current default situation in the US is way too far on the anti-build side.
109.
by Dylan16807 27d ago
Crash every currency relative to what? Is that like saying "okay gold is 10x as expensive and nothing else changes"?
110.
by Dylan16807 27d ago
> Seems kind of crazy to me that people shouldnt' have a say in what gets built near them. People get really irrational about things built near them and their say causes problems finding anywhere to build reasonable things. > The
111.
by Dylan16807 27d ago
> several stories higher than any of the other buildings If the highest other building was 2 stories then it would have been 4 taller. More likely 3? Not several. I appreciate your complaint about generic design but damn putting apartm
112.
by Dylan16807 27d ago
In many environments it ends up acting like a generic "don't build things" mandate. Such a mandate's wins are by accident more often than by target, and it does more harm than good.
113.
by Dylan16807 27d ago
> Mandating Google choose the “one right” link is the failure point, here. (Not because I disagree.) I'm talking about the actual search results. They already do that part. > Similar problems with mandating that they track what’
114.
by Dylan16807 27d ago
If someone searches for a specific product, you could still have competitor ads in a relatively fair way, but you have to put them after the correct link. Putting them first is going to mislead so many people. And you could advertise r
115.
by Dylan16807 27d ago
Energy going up 16%, because gasoline went up 30%, is the main reason "core CPI" and full CPI are a full percent apart, 2.4% versus 3.4%.
116.
by Dylan16807 27d ago
True but that option got a lot worse when they disabled port forwarding.
117.
by Dylan16807 27d ago
I'll say it again but simpler: The "user identifiers" are just having an account. That's when it's not set to be anonymous in the first place. When it is set to be anonymous, it doesn't do this.
118.
by Dylan16807 27d ago
> the conspiracy aspect is alleging a conspiracy without providing any evidence Nobody alleged a conspiracy. > Calling someone a liar because you invented a conversation in your head isn't entirely sane That's not why they s
119.
by Dylan16807 27d ago
Losing money as a company is fine. Losing money on each sale is often anti-competitive.
120.
by Dylan16807 27d ago
Nobody did that. When they said "shitty" they meant the specific kind relevant to the rules they were discussing.

More ›