Drup

9 ms·

181.
by Drup 11y ago
They are not "very right" due to all the scoping weirdness and the late binding semantic.
182.
by Drup 11y ago
How about a language that is not shit instead ? Javascript is the C++ of web dev. You bolt a ton of things on top of a shitty language and you hope to obtain a slice of it that is decent in the long run. Except it's still going to be f
183.
by Drup 11y ago
More than that, It's very interesting to look at one of the (numerous) metal subgenre and see how the various band are mapped, defining tendencies in the subgenre. It works very well in power and doom metal, in particular.
184.
by Drup 11y ago
http://opam.ocaml.org/blog/Signing-the-opam-repository/
185.
by Drup 11y ago
Yes, please open up the code, notice how the implementation of HTTP handling is approximately 30 lines long, and ask yourself if you would actually want to use that. ;)
186.
by Drup 11y ago
Hum, OWebl doesn't exist. The author made some buzz because he's decent at marketing (and much better at it than the rest of the OCaml community, clearly), but it doesn't mean it's a thing. There are other (good) web fra
187.
by Drup 11y ago
Interesting article, I would like to comment two parts > The French fondness for abstraction appears in its most paradoxical (and perverse) form in the absence of precise statistical information about their Maghrebi minorities, as it is
188.
by Drup 11y ago
There is a small difference though: Using those various OCaml features is not going to instantly kill you. With the deprecated features of C++, I'm not so sure.