Drdrdrq

25 ms·

211.
by Drdrdrq 7y ago
Yes, when / if it is available. I really really really hope they deliver at least hw platform and drivers... Fingers crossed.
212.
by Drdrdrq 7y ago
I was being sarcastic - high score on captcha probably means G knows too much about you. That said, I don't think the scores are reliable. It is possible (probable even) that G is still running experiments.
213.
by Drdrdrq 7y ago
On a flip side: you really should check privacy settings in your Firefox, it seems Google can track you easily there. ;)
214.
by Drdrdrq 7y ago
This, so much! Whenever I could I avoided taking notes and instead copied them from classmates or studied from books.
215.
by Drdrdrq 7y ago
Did anyone figure out what to do with failing SD cards and USB keys? I gave up trying to reinstall everything on my Pi after (almost) every power loss.
216.
by Drdrdrq 7y ago
I know that was sarcasm, but I don't think it applies to Apple. Their managers seem to be employed long-term and they seem to be loyal.
217.
by Drdrdrq 7y ago
> Mac Safari doesn't have that kind of protection. It doesn't, but it has a brother that does (iOS Safari). So the leverage Apple has web is very strong, much stronger than that of Firefox.
218.
by Drdrdrq 7y ago
Thank you, that was really inspiring!
219.
by Drdrdrq 7y ago
I know of someone who tried to backup company wiki with wget. There were links that would delete pages, "protected" by some JavaScript which didn’t get triggered. Fortunately they had some real backups, but the error seems to be q
220.
by Drdrdrq 7y ago
This is the sole reason why I would never think about "owning" (if you can call it that) a Tesla.
221.
by Drdrdrq 7y ago
You need to be careful though. For example for Commons Clause they accepted changes by Drew Vault (ironically the author of the article we are discussing here) which are misleading at best. Now it says that commercial use is not allowed [0]
222.
by Drdrdrq 7y ago
For example this? https://writing.kemitchell.com/ ;) (GP is the author - it contains some very good explanations on the subject of licenses, imho of course)
223.
by Drdrdrq 7y ago
Except it's not really unauthorized access if the owner of the account allows you to publish in his/her name, is it?
224.
by Drdrdrq 7y ago
Interesting that most comments deal with why flat structure doesn't work. Newsflash: of course there is always a boss. Someone needs to sign the paycheck after all. But the term "flat structure" usually refers to lack of mid
225.
by Drdrdrq 7y ago
Did you read the article? The whole point is not to seek agreement, but a few proponents (authors) and no fundamental flaws.
226.
by Drdrdrq 7y ago
Couldn't agree more, except with meta comment 3 it is very important to describe the bad thing, so that future me knows if he can safely rewrite this or not.
227.
by Drdrdrq 7y ago
Or pay commercial license, thus supporting the project.
228.
by Drdrdrq 7y ago
That is seriously weird. I don't have the fastest machine possible yet FF starts in a second or two. Bigger problem are the apps that consume too much CPU and memory. Unfortunately there is no nice way to avoid their killing the whole
229.
by Drdrdrq 7y ago
I think this is fair, but do you ever manage to actually recover the funds?
230.
by Drdrdrq 7y ago
Also true.
231.
by Drdrdrq 7y ago
Fair to the user - less than with FOSS, but more than with proprietary licenses. Fair to developer, yes. But the problem for me is that if developers don't have incentives aligned with their users', then we get low quality softwar
232.
by Drdrdrq 7y ago
Yes, I think we are in agreement. Except that MIT is not as well understood as most people think it is (Kyle Mitchell wrote about it, can't find the link right now), so you might want to lawyer up for opensource too. :) I just think a
233.
by Drdrdrq 7y ago
They probably meant Lucene that ES is based on.
234.
by Drdrdrq 7y ago
> And sure, maybe its as simple as "are you profiting from it" -- but then we get into weird edge cases of me using your software on my router that I use for my real estate business or something. Just to be clear, if you are re
235.
by Drdrdrq 7y ago
This is exactly it. GPL worked in the past, but if we take a look at Android (which is based on Linux) we can see that it failed to protect users' freedoms completely.
236.
by Drdrdrq 7y ago
Yes, but that is just because they represent a risk for Google. Their incentives are quite different than Google's, and that is what matters.
237.
by Drdrdrq 7y ago
Thank you (and sibling for the example), I was not aware of that. I did check SA out, but missed this somehow, so I'm using psycopg2 directly now... But if I gain portability to other DBs for low effort, then I'm all for it. Tha
238.
by Drdrdrq 7y ago
Yes, you need to remove the said comment (or PII in it) upon their request (ianal,...). I don't see how a competitor could abuse that.
239.
by Drdrdrq 7y ago
Probably that they could force old generation of workers out one way or the other?
240.
by Drdrdrq 7y ago
Dignity.

More ›