Drdrdrq

8 ms·

31.
by Drdrdrq 5y ago
It would be interesting to profile these sites and make PRs for Firefox to fix any possible issues, then see how long it takes for Google to find new ways to make them slow again.
32.
by Drdrdrq 5y ago
When was the last time you could install anything on Windows without rebooting? I'm exaggerating a bit, but not much.
33.
by Drdrdrq 5y ago
Otoh, why even bother with Chrome, when you have Firefox, Brave and others to choose from? It's not like there is any substantial difference between them. At this point we don't need (extra) evidence of wrongdoing, the incentives
34.
by Drdrdrq 5y ago
So what you are saying is that they are very good at filtering spam, they just got inbox and junk folders mixed up? ;)
35.
by Drdrdrq 5y ago
> If you come across a site where the performance is noticeably worse than in Chrome, it may be worth notifying the owner. There is an exception to this - G sites routinely run slower on FF, but this is very likely how Google wants it to
36.
by Drdrdrq 5y ago
So, when can we get these laptops in EU? Pretty please? :-)
37.
by Drdrdrq 5y ago
Humour is what drew me to it the first time I read it. A friend pointed out that there are some hidden jokes that only make sense when you already know how it will end, so I read it again, and again... And kept discovering new layers. With
38.
by Drdrdrq 6y ago
I think they are talking about Konqueror, not QT. Konqueror is what KHTML was developed for, iirc.
39.
by Drdrdrq 6y ago
If only Mark Zuckerberg knew this back then... /s
40.
by Drdrdrq 6y ago
Are you saying Google did that? Any links?
41.
by Drdrdrq 6y ago
TimescaleDB licensing is mightily confusing. Instead of clarifying here, you might want to provide clear licensing info for all your products on your webpage . Happy (non-paying) user otherwise, but this is a bit shady in my eyes.
42.
by Drdrdrq 6y ago
Yes, it is not. But who cares? What I care about as a user is repairability: * can I inspect source and build it myself? * can I fix it? * can I share modifications with others? Many of the new "cloud protection licenses" offer t
43.
by Drdrdrq 6y ago
Same here. I now run them read only.
44.
by Drdrdrq 6y ago
I guess it depends on their jurisdiction? If someone knows more, please do share.
45.
by Drdrdrq 6y ago
> minus temperatures Nitpick: it is difficult to take a shower with water in solid form (ice).
46.
by Drdrdrq 6y ago
Really? So I can reach my cousin via Signal, even though he is on WhatsApp?
47.
by Drdrdrq 6y ago
Does that happen? One would assume that the slower update pace is just a matter of policy, so with vandalism they would be able to apply fixes much faster.
48.
by Drdrdrq 6y ago
By having leaders who want this and who know how to achieve it. It is simply a matter of principles and trust (both ways). Granted, I have only seen this in companies up to 100 employees... :shrug:
49.
by Drdrdrq 6y ago
This is not a bad solution, as long as the teams are on the same side (and know it too). I strongly believe that toxic culture is neither needed nor useful, ever.
50.
by Drdrdrq 6y ago
Our "solution" is to have 2 GitLab instances, one CE for projects used by guests, and the other one (paid) for regular users. Infuriating.
51.
by Drdrdrq 6y ago
Automated tests rule, but nothing beats end to end tests, not to even mention that they are also eating their own dogfood. Awesome solution, gp, thanks for sharing!
52.
by Drdrdrq 6y ago
And? Are you saying that Apple couldn't build rockets?
53.
by Drdrdrq 6y ago
What do you mean, hidden? It's just a link.
54.
by Drdrdrq 6y ago
Except that they are only recording and transmitting data for a limited number of areas. Still a challenge though, I agree.
55.
by Drdrdrq 6y ago
I like the design, but I have trouble seeing how this could work in practice, and I have lots of experience with wireframes otherwise. Does anyone here actually use a predefined set of wireframes? How does that work? Do you search through
56.
by Drdrdrq 6y ago
Just use pyenv (careful with spelling), then you can use any version you like.
57.
by Drdrdrq 6y ago
> Redis adopted a strategy of adding a severely restrictive “commons clause” to updated versions of their existing open source tools,... Severely restrictive? I'm amazed at how bad (undeserved imho) reputation Commons Clause license
58.
by Drdrdrq 6y ago
Nor does it need to. Card holder has a more powerful weapon: chargeback.
59.
by Drdrdrq 6y ago
Not a big name myself, but I'm always surprised that this surprises people. I mostly use print statements, simply because a) every environment has them, b) there is much less (none) fiddling involved to set them up, and c) because debu
60.
by Drdrdrq 6y ago
Because Pentagon is not one of its clients?

More ›