Don_

4 ms·

1.
by Don_ 12y ago
What's the point of bringing it up, though? How is that relevant to a technical video like this one? Furthermore, how is it fair to put the things he says under the same scrutiny as a person who doesn't have schizophrenia?
2.
by Don_ 13y ago
I'm sorry, but you haven't really made any real argument here that wasn't a baseless non-sequitur or slippery slope, and apparently only acted on the fact that you have a strong stance against this person. None of the example
3.
by Don_ 13y ago
>It's a whole another issue whether he should resign as a CEO of an organization that prides itself for being open and inclusive (or at least issue an apology and/or a statement of his changed mind on this issue). Why would eit
4.
by Don_ 13y ago
Are you even listening to yourself arguing with nothing but a baseless ad hominem AND still having the gall to ask someone if he's listening to himself?
5.
by Don_ 13y ago
Facebook has already proven to be a huge antagonist in many many ways. We can, however, give Oculus the benefit of the doubt; they might have ended up doing nasty things even if they hadn't gotten acquired by Facebook, sure, but Carmac
6.
by Don_ 13y ago
The summary/abstract/whatever isn't really saying anything new. We've known we can make a brute force attack on WPA2 by temporarily de-authenticating a client for years, and yes, obviously it takes longer the longer the
7.
by Don_ 13y ago
To be fair, at this point it is too late to reverse the situation and name things appropriately, specially due to the fact that "cracker" is a well known slang for something else... Using the appropriate terms at this point would
8.
by Don_ 13y ago
>All these tape/paper/etc advices to cover the webcam Jesus Christ, guys. Do you use Linux? Just blacklist the webcam module to preventing it from loading whenever the system boots. Want to use the webcam? Load the module manua