DeonPenny

11 ms·

61.
by DeonPenny 6y ago
What they did this week sealed their fate. Section 230 was supposed to make social networks public squares but that line is obviously being ignore especially by some people because they think censoring things they think are wrong is moral.
62.
by DeonPenny 6y ago
Section 203 made them a public square because unlike the private property who would be liable for whats done on that land twitter gets a pass. And its looking more and more like they shouldn't. And if that happens twitter wont exist.
63.
by DeonPenny 6y ago
Of course it should. Not only practically because twitter shouldn't be monitoring the government that polices it, but also cause if that government lets say strips twitter protections it would be dumb of twitter to have done.
64.
by DeonPenny 6y ago
What you talking about thats been a thing since before the internet was a thing is called the October surpise. Its allowed. It's legal. Youre not allowed to suppress your political opponent in the last moment cause that could escalate
65.
by DeonPenny 6y ago
Except for the fact that section 230 argues they shouldnt be censoring anything. So they should be liable to be sued for doing things like this like any other publication.
66.
by DeonPenny 6y ago
How can you say its false. The FBI took it seriously. If we said the same about wikileaks or trump taxes we'd all flip out. Twitter shouldn't be the people who get to say whats false or not.
67.
by DeonPenny 6y ago
Yeh but what about wikileaks, trumps taxes, and so many other story. But even if it was policy the fact they banned the press secretary of the united states should give everyone pause.
68.
by DeonPenny 6y ago
The fact that they censor everyone including the press secretary so quickly is scary. Like the voice of the president got twitter ban like a commoner with the snap of a finger.
69.
by DeonPenny 6y ago
Its scary how efficient they were. It felt like it was automated.
70.
by DeonPenny 6y ago
Got to be Elon Musk. Makes too much sense
71.
by DeonPenny 6y ago
.com and .net have always been all but .us. Since .us didn't exist when the web was created
72.
by DeonPenny 6y ago
Why would anyone use that internet. Fair doesn't mean optimal. It would be fair if anyone who published a social media site would get an equal share of the traffic. Isn't optimal though
73.
by DeonPenny 6y ago
They should just turn it into a signup and login page and investigate anyone that comes by
74.
by DeonPenny 6y ago
Can you mark yelp the company as racist on yelp cause they've definitely been accuse of racism. I don't know a specific time but my intuition of how the world works tells me this is true.
75.
by DeonPenny 6y ago
I'm pretty sure most of there work is US military work. Whether its putting up GPS or other sats
76.
by DeonPenny 6y ago
Those innovations have 0 to do with labor of the workers. The cost of the investment in the innovation is where the wage went. How does it make sense to pay for that twice. The worker sans the innovation is no more productive.
77.
by DeonPenny 6y ago
Not to mention the minimum wage was randomly picked by a govt worker. Who says the wage picked at any given time would be the best minimum wage and would have negative consequence like other minimum wage increases.
78.
by DeonPenny 6y ago
Why would pay keep up with productivity gains when the productivity of the labor purchased by a wage hasnt kept up with productivity gains. Businesses run on actual formulas. So if a mcdonald resturant doesn't make the the 100x% growt
79.
by DeonPenny 6y ago
Because in tech its easy to just move jobs or negotiate on your own. Unions would just have government in you businesses, and make it harder for workers. Not to mention programmers are cheap and wont pay the union fees. I know I wouldn&#x27
80.
by DeonPenny 6y ago
You could pay 10k to be told to teach yourself in person.
81.
by DeonPenny 6y ago
Because how do these kid even get skills if the required amount to pay them prices them out of the market. You'd probably hire a drop out if you could pay much less in wages, but I see a lot of people avoiding that apprenticeship path.
82.
by DeonPenny 6y ago
No government multilateral trade agreements did that by making it cheaper to do it.
83.
by DeonPenny 6y ago
This seems to me that this is a result of the training young people get being more and more divergent from the actual work the economy needs because of governmental gerrymandering. People made it impossible to apprentice at lower wages for
84.
by DeonPenny 6y ago
I think history disagrees with that. With deregulation and incentive and because how the resource pool in human civilization according to Pareto distributions. You can have a individual coordinate most things bottom up if you let them. Like
85.
by DeonPenny 6y ago
But you have to think the CCP know what to optimize for. Which history shows us govts rarely know more than people faced with issues daily.
86.
by DeonPenny 6y ago
Anyone who met a crow knows this. MFs are sneaky smart and get up to anything and everything. Like if you gave a group 16 boys wings.
87.
by DeonPenny 6y ago
Those are the least likely people to actually listen to this. Lets see how this goes.
88.
by DeonPenny 6y ago
Thats not how any of this works. The problem with a market is you have a rate that if something is below it its not profitable for people to live in a place. Idk why people blame the building owners. And people who do this are always people
89.
by DeonPenny 6y ago
Yeh in the EU in general it grew but that doesn't actually answer you first questions and it obfuscates the growing difference. This is because the EU as a whole because of the easter bloc country was growing from a much much smaller n
90.
by DeonPenny 6y ago
No this doesn't tell the full picture because the gap is the same for company like germany where the GDP per capita in 2008 was 45k and now is 48k. In 2008 the US was 46k and is now 63k. The rate that these economies are diverging is t

More ›