DeliriousDog

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by DeliriousDog 2y ago

   Completely agree on limiting yourself reducing the nesting of code. There is more difficulty working with code such as if x { //... } else { //... } Than code like if x { // returns from this block } /&#x2
2. 2.▲
   by DeliriousDog 2y ago

   This comment is disgusting. Voting is what they did about it, and they still have their rights at risk.
3. 3.▲
   by DeliriousDog 2y ago

   You aren't attempting to defraud anyone. The intent is clearly to prevent entities from publishing clearly fake/ill-gotten reviews. The first amendment does not protect your speech when that speech is used to assist in committing
4. 4.▲
   by DeliriousDog 2y ago

   Thank you! Reading that comment was actually what prompted me to make an account just to reply that, and then when I did it was gone.
5. 5.▲
   by DeliriousDog 2y ago

   The issue isn't the "hunt for the bottom line" but the fact that simultaneously multiple parties are offered different price points for an unknown reason (to the workers). You say it's not discrimination, but you cannot
6. 6.▲
   by DeliriousDog 2y ago

   There was a (now deleted comment) about how there is no proof of wage discrimination for Uber/Lyft drivers, which was posted with no evidence. This video ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEXJmNj6SPk ) was recently publi