DeeplySuspect

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by DeeplySuspect 13y ago

   There's no logic involved : Greenwald said something that wasn't true (whether that something came from him or the official who spoke with him is not yet clear). Then the closer you look, the more emerges: Miranda in his later
2. 2.▲
   by DeeplySuspect 13y ago

   He was smart to refuse the lawyer, but Greenwald's assertion that Miranda was not allowed a lawyer present was not actually grounded in reality. This whole thing stinks.
3. 3.▲
   by DeeplySuspect 13y ago

   Another inconsistency: check out Greenwald's original write-up [1] > At the time the "security official" called me, David had > been detained for 3 hours. The security official told me > that they had the right to de
4. 4.▲
   by DeeplySuspect 13y ago

   All I want is the truth. The details are inconsistent - someone's being economical with the truth. We found out that the NSA lied repeatedly, and I'll be bitterly disappointed if the other side doesn't hold itself to the high
5. 5.▲
   by DeeplySuspect 13y ago

   This counterproductive use of the courts is just the latest development in a story which doesn't quite add up. Miranda said that the police asked him to hand over all his passwords ("they got me to tell them the passwords for my c