Dayshine

30 ms·

301.
by Dayshine 7y ago
Right, sure, I hadn't really thought about how copyright isn't really enforceable against individuals. That's very interesting. However, I'm really not sure how this is relevant to your moral stance on commercial u
302.
by Dayshine 7y ago
Why can't I have terms on my website that say how you can use my information? Examples where this is allowed: - Images/media (Creative commons) - Code (Open source licenses) You say it isn't allowed for: - Personal data Unles
303.
by Dayshine 7y ago
And as a user of LinkedIn this news is terrible. I share my personal data with LinkedIn under the terms you promise, which includes not sharing it with third parties for commercial use. If you can't enforce that then I can't use L
304.
by Dayshine 7y ago
Well, my name, my job title, my employer, my job history. These are all my information, and selling them to marketing companies is definitely not archiving. Would you be OK with a company scraping your blog and selling it?
305.
by Dayshine 7y ago
The thing is, GDPR has theoretically solved this in the EU. The UK's ICO is about to publish guidance prohibiting scraping public user information for marketing (where the user would not expect it to be used for that). It's a real
306.
by Dayshine 7y ago
What you might mean is: - I want my data to be publicly available - I don't want my data to be processed/distributed/sold without my permission E.g. individual use is fine, profit making is not. Which is my expectation with L
307.
by Dayshine 7y ago
>I think LinkedIn users would be surprised that LinkedIn doesn’t let bots read (scrape) their public CV. LinkedIn is really really clear that: - They won't share you information with 3rd parties - You're not allowed to use info
308.
by Dayshine 7y ago
I have no idea what you're trying to say. Is the comment on career an insult or genuine?
309.
by Dayshine 7y ago
Does Wine still require the complicated, hard to manage, and poorly documented use of various combinations of WINEPREFIX, Winetricks and WINEARCH? It always seemed to me the easiest thing was to spin up a new VM for every application I want
310.
by Dayshine 7y ago
He might not have succeeded in getting rich, but he can still turn this into an incredibly effective $40k donation to public health research. I'm sure there is a researcher out there who can find hosting for this service, and maybe con
311.
by Dayshine 7y ago
As you're now 18 months on from July 2018, so have probably moved onto other things... Please consider approaching some academic institutions, or some medical professional associations to see if they would be interested. While I doubt
312.
by Dayshine 7y ago
YouTube doesn't, patreon doesn't, vimeo has a small claims exemption. So, yeah, not at all universal
313.
by Dayshine 7y ago
This isn't a standard term in consumer contracts nor business contracts. As a user I would rather be able to sue in small claims court. As a creator I wouldn't want to have the threat of unlimited extra costs if I have to sue.
314.
by Dayshine 7y ago
I agree, these terms are terrible for both "Pilots" (users) and "Creators". - Binding arbitration in Canada where the loser pays all costs. - They can increase "Pledge fees" arbitrarily with just a single email
315.
by Dayshine 7y ago
> We encourage you to contact us if you have an issue. If a dispute does arise out of these terms of use or related to your use of the service, and it cannot be resolved by way of a discussion between us, the matter of the dispute shall
316.
by Dayshine 7y ago
Are you browsing on mobile? It's a 1500 pixel wide image for me, perfect quality.
317.
by Dayshine 7y ago
Yes, spacemacs with evil-mode and the hinting extension is one of the approaches I was referring to when I mentioned them breaking and requiring maintenance.
318.
by Dayshine 7y ago
The overhead of installing and maintaining emacs is sooo high if you want it to be as easily usable as vscode. It takes me hours to remember how to use emacs every time I come back to it, and to make it any easier means adding more and more
319.
by Dayshine 7y ago
> EDIT: The way I see it is if I buy a car with a 3 year warranty and something fails after 4 years, it's not the manufacturer's responsibility to fix it because the warranty has expired. Why do you think it is? The normal expe
320.
by Dayshine 7y ago
Registered non-profit <> non-commercial. - a private website for my local sailing club. - a mod for a game - an open source project that requires a private repository for a few things - any project relating to a private community None
321.
by Dayshine 7y ago
Gitlab is still the only viable choice for non-commercial groups who want private repos though, the 3 private members and no ability to have mixtures of public/private repos in organisations on Github is very limiting.
322.
by Dayshine 7y ago
Could you point me at the paid for equivalent for excel on Linux? If he donated even a thousand dollars he wouldn't get the product he can get for almost free on windows.
323.
by Dayshine 7y ago
For business use, sure, but not for personal use. Relying on recovery methods for all your yubikey secured accounts would be a vast amount of work.
324.
by Dayshine 7y ago
The obvious solution to me (although I don't see it recommended on the yubikey website) is to buy 2 yubikeys and register both with services. Then put the 2nd in a locked safe or other location that requires someone to have absurd acce
325.
by Dayshine 7y ago
Hi, I'm the author of a niche language server extension ( https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=tboby.cw... ). Is there any guidance on what I would need to do to support VSO? Do I need to do anything? I&#x
326.
by Dayshine 7y ago
No they can't, not legally.
327.
by Dayshine 7y ago
Stata doesn't even version its packages, so it's literally impossible to reproduce research as you can't retrieve the packages as they were then. The maintainer of a popular package could choose to change their api today and
328.
by Dayshine 7y ago
You! :) AGPL requires all users to open-source their projects using your work, even if they don't modify your work. It is an extension of GPL not LGPL. If my web application uses an AGPL library, it's a derivative work. I, like ma
329.
by Dayshine 7y ago
Hey, as someone who works in non commercial, public health research, please consider using a license that doesn't penalise charities. If you're using a dual license model, only rich organisations can use your software in security
330.
by Dayshine 7y ago
Hmm, how does this license protect you? https://commonsclause.com/ says that I can sell n8n.io as a commercial SaaS product. So I can create and sell a new Zapier using n8n?

More ›