Dayshine

27 ms·

271.
by Dayshine 6y ago
Yes, if you refuse to use the features they have that make it easy to just use, it isn't easy to just use. Why is that a surprise?
272.
by Dayshine 6y ago
> - find someone to donate a generic orthogonal routing algorithm based on a modern algorithm since people want this > - it would be a big effort, but move the core algorithms to a framework that supports interaction with layout gener
273.
by Dayshine 6y ago
Thankfully, some trial oversight committees had the sense to check if there was any evidence of harm in their primary data. https://www.recoverytrial.net/news/recruitment-to-the-recove... > ‘On Saturday 23 May, the
274.
by Dayshine 6y ago
Would you describe this as Poaching: - Finding a small zoo - Deliberately bankrupting them - Buying their animals cheap and slaughtering them In my mind Poaching equates to using illegal or unethical means to hunt animals. Bankrupting a zoo
275.
by Dayshine 6y ago
> Having worked as a consultant, I'm repulsed by the idea that I'd need my company's permission to leave and go work for a client For a large consultancy with many clients, I agree. But when a significant portion of your e
276.
by Dayshine 6y ago
> to describe getting employees to voluntarily join your company by offering better compensation Huh? They withdrew the contract from their current employer, making them redundant, then offered them a job. I'm not sure abusing you
277.
by Dayshine 6y ago
> The LinkedIn message went on to say Take-Two was setting up a new studio to keep working on the same game Star Theory had been developing, a sequel to the cult classic Kerbal Space Program. Take-Two was looking to hire all of Star Theo
278.
by Dayshine 6y ago
I appreciate it because when I follow twitter links in my hacker news app I get rate limit blocked...
279.
by Dayshine 6y ago
> with a clause that prohibits mega-corps from wholesale rebranding and using your code That didn't happen in this case. They took the ideas, and took his knowledge by leading him on and interviewing him for an acqui-hire. They didn
280.
by Dayshine 6y ago
You can totally rewrite your entire git history to make the entire repository GPL. You have no obligation to continue hosting the MIT version, and you can release a new version of every commit under GPL.
281.
by Dayshine 6y ago
> $100k isn't a particularly good programmer salary It's 95th percentile for a lead developer in the UK... and probably everywhere outside some areas in the US.
282.
by Dayshine 6y ago
Yup, although it's i3 not dmenu causing the problem. https://github.com/i3/i3/issues/949 Reported 7 years ago...
283.
by Dayshine 6y ago
> Not i3 snappy i3 isn't even snappy, the default application launcher can take up to 10 seconds to open on my old laptop. There is a faster application launcher you can use instead, but you have to hunt through github issues to fin
284.
by Dayshine 6y ago
> Bars and churches Uh, what? I (and I imagine a good 50%+ of the hacker news readership, perhaps 75%+ if you exclude the USA) am never going to go to either of those without already knowing people. > generic meetups, smallgroups, dog
285.
by Dayshine 6y ago
No, of course I wouldn't, but my understanding is that Google (unlike any other company I know) will "pierce the corporate veil" and ban people not accounts. It's not hard to correlate accounts, my chrome is logged into
286.
by Dayshine 6y ago
Hi, I currently use Azure which has strict lines between organisation tenancies/domains/accounts and personal ones. This means I know that my liability is limited to my business. Can you assure me that if I move to GCP, have a VM
287.
by Dayshine 6y ago
Hi, I've had the same job for ten years. You were founded later than that, so my current employer knows I used it while working for them. Is that OK with you?
288.
by Dayshine 6y ago
Are you sure curl installation scripts are better than vanilla installers + shared config files?
289.
by Dayshine 6y ago
But this is clearly the default situation for any project not hosted under an organisation.
290.
by Dayshine 6y ago
What are you talking about re VS Code? I maintain an extension which provides a language server. I don't have to register intentions. I get the whole api and I even run a bundled executable which has full read/write/execute a
291.
by Dayshine 6y ago
So, I write a niche language server along with an adapter for VS Code. What are you frequently jumping to that isn't a symbol? I can expose anything through the LSP api. Thinking about it, every single piece of text is covered by symbo
292.
by Dayshine 6y ago
> Just because you don't like IRC doesn't make it less open No, but having discussions somewhere completely unlinked to your open source repository without a searchable archive and no way to link to discussions does. Hell, even
293.
by Dayshine 6y ago
The problem of course is that if you have - an open source project which you advertise as collaborative open source - a personal vision for what you want in your project - and hence, a secret list of requests you will turn down Then freque
294.
by Dayshine 7y ago
Huh, wow, those are some pretty massive holes in the "official" narrative. I'm not sure I'd call him a conspiracy theorist for this, isn't it normal that the public aren't told the true progression of events fo
295.
by Dayshine 7y ago
> If open sourcing your code presents any risk to sensitive personal information, then that means that you are already grossly mishandling this information This is also clearly false. For example, take this scenario: - You use web framew
296.
by Dayshine 7y ago
The source code will indicate where/how the data is input, processed and stored. It might help an attacker compromise the application in any number of ways. There's non-trivial risk there, enough to make it an ethical concern. So,
297.
by Dayshine 7y ago
My understanding is you can simplify it into roughly three tiers of "connection": 1. Same application, dll linked 2. Same computer, IPC linked 3. Different computer, HTTP/etc linked Companies that use AGPL will tell you that
298.
by Dayshine 7y ago
What improvements? AGPL requires open-sourcing your entire project (authentication, payment platform, etc) just to link to a backend PDF processing library. AGPL does not have a linking exception.
299.
by Dayshine 7y ago
A research project might be collecting sensitive personal information. A charity might have a public but internal management system for staff or related organisations to organise on. In either case, being open source increases security risk
300.
by Dayshine 7y ago
If you're considering adopting AGPL and the reason is to prevent commercial abuse of your work: Please consider adding a non-commercial use exemption, for charities and academic research. These organisations can't afford the cost

More ›