David147

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by David147 6y ago

   It seems like Calegari is chasing after PR and may be angry at computer scientists getting into his field. His criticism was discussed and found incorrect by the peer review process: https://static-content.springer.com/esm&#
2. 2.▲
   by David147 6y ago

   Looking at his post, the main criticism is "that the program has not yet generated anything new", but the post does not refer to the actual results (like formulas for Catalan's and Apery's constants).
3. 3.▲
   by David147 6y ago

   Funny that no other name other than Frank Calegari's appear in the Wikipedia page
4. 4.▲
   by David147 6y ago

   The two blog posts by Frank Calegari are from July 2019 and irrelevant to the paper in Nature (from February 2021). The paper went through peer review by mathematicians and experts in the field.