Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
DarkmSparks
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
31.
▲
by
DarkmSparks
7mo ago
Replaced all our windows machines with mac silicon and linux 6 months ago. No one is going back no matter what they do now.
32.
▲
by
DarkmSparks
7mo ago
US legal system still as world leading as ever I see. For all the wrong reasons. Recommended compensation: $1500 per hour.
33.
▲
by
DarkmSparks
7mo ago
Jamming the transponder would not be enough, it would also need to at least jam the identification/location messages in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TADIL-J And also at least the satellite versions. And all of wh
34.
▲
by
DarkmSparks
7mo ago
iff is not high power, if it was then anything equipped with iff would all be vulnerable to any anti radiation missile made in the last 70 years.
35.
▲
by
DarkmSparks
7mo ago
Its both. They claimed They jammed the control link so the operators couldnt control it, then used gps spoofing to make its "lost communication fly home" protocol land itself in hostile territory.
36.
▲
by
DarkmSparks
7mo ago
Why? Specs for link16 jamming have been circulating since before the invasion of ukraine, there is a whole DoD technical report dedicated to trying to update it knocking around somewhere. Iran claim to have used it to bring down US drones i
37.
▲
by
DarkmSparks
7mo ago
That is the basis for my theory. Not being on And Being on but jammed look the same from the perspective of the one shooting them down. Also, I wonder how resilient it is to the gps spoofing that been going on. If they managed to trick it i
38.
▲
by
DarkmSparks
7mo ago
My theory is Iran is jamming the link16 iff.
39.
▲
by
DarkmSparks
8mo ago
You have all rights to the code that you wrote that is not "colored" by previous code. Aka "an original work" But code that is any kind of derivative of code before it contains a complex mix of other peoples rights. It c
40.
▲
by
DarkmSparks
8mo ago
No. Because they couldnt have done any of that refactoring without a licence to do so, and that licence forbids them from relicencing it.
41.
▲
by
DarkmSparks
8mo ago
"the laws" being making everything you post on it publically available in bulk for research into social engineering so the brussels elite/monarchies can better manipulate the population. Remind me again exactly why anyone sho
42.
▲
by
DarkmSparks
8mo ago
Put that way sounds very sensible. Hopefully it stays that way.
43.
▲
by
DarkmSparks
10mo ago
E.g. https://www.mvp.express/docs/v0.1.0/examples/kvstore Under examples
44.
▲
by
DarkmSparks
10mo ago
Hmm, I'd expect better from Yale to be honest, this reads like BBCesq style snow melts in winter click bait. Tldr: City that outgrew its water supply recommends moving to a place with more water. Although you wouldn't really get t
45.
▲
by
DarkmSparks
10mo ago
Most of it seems to be 404ing now
46.
▲
by
DarkmSparks
11mo ago
Just used tor browser when I was back last week.
47.
▲
by
DarkmSparks
11mo ago
will they also advertise the service provider being used or will you have to ask? Because I suspect "warning this person isnt an idiot" doesnt turn out to be the warning they expect.
48.
▲
by
DarkmSparks
11mo ago
there are a few more angles to this. Firstly, on the counter argument side, when you visit a website, you are using their hardware, they have every right to make any requirements they want to use their hardware, they are not public spaces.
49.
▲
by
DarkmSparks
11mo ago
Tldr. Anthropic made a load of ubsubstantiated accusations about a new problem they dont specify. Then at the end Anthropic proposed the solution to this unspecified problem is to give anthropic money. Completely agree that is promotional m
50.
▲
by
DarkmSparks
11mo ago
Seems like a great tool for inference training....
51.
▲
by
DarkmSparks
1y ago
They were paid by redhat.
52.
▲
by
DarkmSparks
1y ago
Sure, I am referring there to what started with https://www.science.org/content/article/potential-fabricatio... And finished with the resignation of the stanford prof engaged in it, and all the evidence that they
53.
▲
by
DarkmSparks
1y ago
There are no sources, that is the definition of zero evidence. Also, The fraud was found because the theory was invalidated, not the other way around. It was found that real life did not match the theory (by spending billions on human trial
54.
▲
by
DarkmSparks
1y ago
There is exactly zero evidence to show they cause the damage, the only evidence that once existed to say they caused the damage used 100% faked results, which didnt emerge until after the treatments based on it causing the damage failed to
55.
▲
by
DarkmSparks
1y ago
Name a single success. The best treatments on the market slows cognative decline measurements for up to 6 months "maybe" (could just be the result of pain relief), dates back to like 2001, and have nothing to do with amyloids. >
56.
▲
by
DarkmSparks
1y ago
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) can lead to the rapid formation of amyloid plaques.... So entirely possible they are simply part of how or brain deals with brain cell death. Its possible at this point it's not a "disease" at all
57.
▲
by
DarkmSparks
1y ago
From that link "and only slow progression a relatively small amount." They don't even do that. they _do_ remove plaques, they _do not_ have any statistically significant effect on MMSE degradation. plus I only see the comment
58.
▲
by
DarkmSparks
1y ago
last I heard everything amyloid/plaque burden was suspect after https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/19/us/stanford-president-res... It looks very much like they are a symptom rather than a cause. They h
59.
▲
by
DarkmSparks
1y ago
https://i.ibb.co/FC6pPK5/Screenshot-20251016-032648-Vivaldi....
60.
▲
by
DarkmSparks
1y ago
I have made the claim the only criticisms of the book are logical fallacies. (That I have found) Not 100% clear if you agree or disagree, but the way this works now, is short of any further criticism that isnt a logical fallacy, is just ass
More ›