Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Danox
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
21 ms
·
631.
▲
by
Danox
5mo ago
Distraction, distraction, distraction what happened? The recent visit toChina didn’t go well.
632.
▲
by
Danox
5mo ago
The model makers, mainframe dream of computer’s isn’t coming back no matter what OpenAI, Google, Anthropic or Microsoft want, there are too many smart tech barbarians at the gate that want in and they’re not going to be satisfied to go back
633.
▲
by
Danox
5mo ago
As long as you have slaves/sharecroppers, driving the people at the top of the pyramid at Uber they’re profitable and Uber makes money as long as you don’t care about the workers and as long as you can get around all of the regulations
634.
▲
by
Danox
5mo ago
The problem is I don’t think computing is going back to the mainframe era you know where all the computing is done remotely and the only thing you have in front of you is a terminal that is the AI slop maker’s dream, the computing power on
635.
▲
by
Danox
5mo ago
AI CEOs are known to say many things telling the truth, probably isn’t one of them.
636.
▲
by
Danox
5mo ago
But isn’t training models, a forever task like iterating in tech you can never take a day off, adding humans to the equation don’t humans train/teach themselves new skills over a lifetime, and isn’t one of the selling points in the fut
637.
▲
by
Danox
5mo ago
Some governments are inefficient…
638.
▲
by
Danox
6mo ago
I knew he was gonna say that….
639.
▲
by
Danox
6mo ago
Get a warrant…
640.
▲
by
Danox
6mo ago
Once again, Apple is already given the bums rush to five other companies when they got in the way of what they wanted to build Apple isn’t going to sit around, based upon their recent history in the last 20 years and do nothing. I don’t und
641.
▲
by
Danox
6mo ago
Apple doesn’t need to buy them just need to continue to partner with TSMC, as far as Intel is concerned why would they buy or work with them now? Intel is absolutely low end these days and they were the company that said no to Apple when Ap
642.
▲
by
Danox
6mo ago
As they should…
643.
▲
by
Danox
6mo ago
Definition: Apple is the architect and engineer, and someone else will do the fab probably TSMC who is also motivated to keep their engines running?
644.
▲
by
Danox
6mo ago
Don’t be obtuse, what Apple didn’t do and isn’t doing is spending billions upon billions and dollars trying to train AI models like Meta, Google or Microsoft, Oracle and OpenAI those five companies together have spent well over $1 trillion
645.
▲
by
Danox
6mo ago
It will the Chinese, this will be the last big payday for the three company cartel and in time I think Apple will move in-house and design around.
646.
▲
by
Danox
6mo ago
No, but they can and so can Apple if it becomes critical, I don’t know what is more critical to Apple than replacing Intel, Qualcomm, or Nvidia, but memory probably is number four on the list which means it probably is something that will b
647.
▲
by
Danox
6mo ago
You can thank Apple for buying Anobit many years ago…
648.
▲
by
Danox
6mo ago
Intel and Microsoft are having that same problem right now when the playing field is level, they have trouble competing.
649.
▲
by
Danox
6mo ago
The Chinese will be the one slipping in because of this opportunity. The question is is whether or not you still want to be dependent on outside memory when the Chinese takeover a larger part of the worldwide market?
650.
▲
by
Danox
6mo ago
That’s a decision for the new CEO (thank God he’s a technocrat), more than likely Tim Cook, and John Ternus) probably have already decided on what they’re gonna do long-term, from the outside looking in Apple has already replaced five compa
651.
▲
by
Danox
6mo ago
Apple in the same timeframe also bought Intrinsity, and Anobit (a flash/SSD memory) company the Apple Silicon design group probably can do the design and engineering in house and we know they have the money the question is do they have
652.
▲
by
Danox
6mo ago
Ask Intel, Broadcom, AMD, Nvidia, Samsung chip division and soon to be replaced Qualcomm, Apples SOC designs, probably meant memory was coming in house at some point down the road anyway. The present market conditions will probably just has
653.
▲
by
Danox
6mo ago
I shall keep this brief. Intel sucks. Intel and Microsoft rested on their laurels and now they’re playing catch-up Microsoft may hang in there, but overall worldwide Intel is in trouble.
654.
▲
by
Danox
6mo ago
This AI memory crisis will be their last big payday. I think the Chinese will take advantage of this and take over the memory market worldwide, excluding the United States and some parts of Europe. The rest of the world will end up using Ch
655.
▲
by
Danox
6mo ago
long-term if you want to build new devices, which are smaller faster better memory is gonna have to come in house. How does the Apple Vision, Apple Watch get smaller and four or five times faster? How do you make those Apple Glasses in the
656.
▲
by
Danox
6mo ago
It memory almost certainly is coming in house all you need to do is look at Apple’s history Intel out, Broadcom out, Qualcomm on the way out, Nvidia has been out for a long time, AMD is also out. Apple has the capability and the money, the
657.
▲
by
Danox
6mo ago
The current memory crisis it’s just another/final nail in the coffin for Apple moving the design and engineering of memory in house they have the capability and they have the money to do so.
658.
▲
by
Danox
6mo ago
Apple can deal with the memory shortage in the same way they dealt with Intel saying no to building a processor for the iPhone the Apple Silicon design group can certainly do what’s necessary in house to design memory and SSD’s in house, an
659.
▲
by
Danox
6mo ago
What fight? OpenAI is getting nothing from Apple just like Bloomberg is not getting any money for me to read their article.
660.
▲
by
Danox
6mo ago
Ironically, the Civil Rights movement…
More ›