4 ms·
What fight? OpenAI is getting nothing from Apple just like Bloomberg is not getting any money for me to read their article.
by Danox 6mo ago
What fight? OpenAI is getting nothing from Apple just like Bloomberg is not getting any money for me to read their article.
- mrhottakes 6mo agoI can only see the first couple of paragraphs, but it's OpenAI following in the footsteps of every other company that doesn't have a viable product: litigation.
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]
- khazhoux 6mo agoI lol’d at this because I also didn’t pay for access. But… aren’t we all just hypocrites and kind of jerks to not give even a few dollars to people out there doing reporting and providing us with information? “Ads and tracking are bad, boo! Pay $5 for a subscription — hell no!”
- manquer 6mo agolol wish Bloomberg was that cheap . Last time I renewed It was like 280/yr and retail is like $35/month. Still probably worth it , financial news publishers generally have less bias[1]/sensationalism than general broadsheets. Bloomberg/FT have been by my go to for factual news without too much hyperbole , click bait. [1] There will be pro-business bias of course which in US these days I think as outside the political spectrum , both parties have very bad polices for businesses or labour.
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]
- GrinningFool 6mo agoWhile subscriptions can net you ad-free content, they rarely let you have it tracking-free.
- neurocline 6mo agoI used to spend money on Bloomberg’s news magazine (newspaper), but stopped because it’s a distant second to the Economist.
- drivingmenuts 6mo agoIf payment isn't required, I'm not going to pay unless there is extraordinary value. Your failure to establish a sustainable business model is not my problem.
- layer8 6mo agoWhile (presumably) no money was exchanged, Apple and OpenAI entered a contractual agreement, and apparently OpenAI believes that Apple hasn’t met its contractual obligations.