DannyBee

55 ms·

721.
by DannyBee 3y ago
See: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/11/01/2023-23... and https://www.cpsc.gov/cgibin/neissquery/Data/Highlights/2022/... for general data For tab
722.
by DannyBee 3y ago
"He is opposed to this but expects it to pass. His best argument is that it would effectively outlaw affordable low end "contractor" portable job-site style table saws" "job site saws" account for 18% of the ma
723.
by DannyBee 3y ago
I do not, for a second, believe most maintainers would take money in exchange for being forced to follow good best practices in coding, testing, releasing, etc Some would, but most are believing they would get paid for a hobby. Nobody is g
724.
by DannyBee 3y ago
Example?
725.
by DannyBee 3y ago
Yes, most commercial hotspots use it. Particularly the redirect to login page ones. If you get some form of “you need to login” pop up notification, it is the main way they detect that. Those that don’t give you such a notification are p
726.
by DannyBee 3y ago
Fair, you are correct, i was mixing up c and d. Then the part they elided from d comes into play: "unless such communication is intercepted for the purpose of committing any criminal or tortious act in violation of the Constitution or
727.
by DannyBee 3y ago
They had explicit consent to do it?
728.
by DannyBee 3y ago
It is neither. The legal system did not wait. The plaintiffs did. Because they thought they would get more through bankruptcy , similar to the opiate settlement
729.
by DannyBee 3y ago
No. Its written as a set of negatives- it shall be unlawful for someone not x to do y Here it is saying it’s illegal unless you are an official acting under color of law and there is one party consent
730.
by DannyBee 3y ago
Lawyer here. No. They have ...'d out an important part of 2511(2)(d). (and they probably meant (c)) First, it starts out with: "It shall not be unlawful under this chapter for a person not acting under color of law " This bas
731.
by DannyBee 3y ago
"At some point the US court system needs to examine the timeliness of judgements as a core component of justice" It does. The rest of what you write isn't actually what happened, though to be fair the article sort of makes a
732.
by DannyBee 3y ago
It's 35 because the park rangers won't let them have more.
733.
by DannyBee 3y ago
"It’s kind of baffling that after decades of wifi and captive portals, we still don’t have any kind of standard for the network to properly signal the fact “you’ll need to visit <url> in a browser” to a device. " We do, actu
734.
by DannyBee 3y ago
It won't. They only have to accept cash for debts already incurred.
735.
by DannyBee 3y ago
This lawsuit will be dismissed quickly. Legal tender does not mean what they think it does.
736.
by DannyBee 3y ago
Which it has been able to do nothing with for decades. Once you have all the eyeballs, if you still can't make money that is really not good.
737.
by DannyBee 3y ago
Nokia sued Amazon (and HP) over video streaming. There are plenty of non-phone/non-hardware ones i didn't list.
738.
by DannyBee 3y ago
I mean you can replace "reddit" with anyone and it's still true. Nokia has sued Apple, Amazon, Google, HP, ... It has certainly threatened many more. It's probably easier at this point to list the companies they aren&#x2
739.
by DannyBee 3y ago
TL;DR I would not assume they are not using it, or that this is about 3.125% memory/cache usage. Longer answer: Google folks were responsible for pushing on Hardware MTE in the first place - It originally came from the folks who also
740.
by DannyBee 3y ago
To give you an example, these are often used in CNC machines. Before you had to have: A. a PLC that ran logic with real time guarantees to tie everything together. The PLC is often user-modified to add more logic. B. Decoders that processe
741.
by DannyBee 3y ago
They already supported this line rate though, for years? What am i missing? (IE It's still only pcie gen3, and this announcement doesn't change that)
742.
by DannyBee 3y ago
This is kinda true. But the flip side is most of them tell you ahead of time whether something is recommended for new designs, and how long they will guarantee production for. Which is much more important. In this day and age with FPGA comp
743.
by DannyBee 3y ago
"I read a lot of Taleb in my early 20s, and he'd call this iatrogenics in a non-medical context, and I'd agree. One of the ex-Pivotal guys I spoke to mentioned that most of the highest-performing teams emerged from "beni
744.
by DannyBee 3y ago
Having a friend who has represented whistleblowers, etc, yes, this happens. Sometimes for good reason (you are on a classified project, etc). Sometimes for bad reason (we don't want anyone to be able to prove anything). The latter is s
745.
by DannyBee 3y ago
Sure, that's fair. I would say 'that is an unethical but 'reasonable' strategy for a rich CEO or whatever as an individual' (where reasonable here is 'probably would work' not 'morally sound'). I
746.
by DannyBee 3y ago
Yes, that's fair. I meant it as sort of "the barest possible minimum to even start to argue it's worth it". Most of the time, the issue is not the error bars in thinking about the quantity. They aren't thinking it n
747.
by DannyBee 3y ago
Sure, I think that is a fair view. I almost added to the comment the following, which i suspect you would agree with: "obviously they should have some area of significant technical competence that is within an area the company cares a
748.
by DannyBee 3y ago
I suspect you are wrong on the first part, at least for large technology companies. I do agree with the view of what is needed in practice to be a good leader. However, i think your assumption there is no need to do that is wrong. Take an
749.
by DannyBee 3y ago
"Why does a practicing lawyer have more thoughts on programming than every CTO I've had a 1:1 with at a big company?" I mean, it's sort of outside the point of this article (which i understand and agree with), but as a p
750.
by DannyBee 3y ago
" I wonder if Boeing doesn't want to admit that for some legal reason, maybe they don't have a lot of documentation they say they should have. " This would be a bad legal strategy. Playing this through as a lawyer: 1. Y

More ›