4 ms·
"At some point the US court system needs to examine the timeliness of judgements as a core component of justice" It does. The rest of what you write isn't act
by DannyBee 3y ago
"At some point the US court system needs to examine the timeliness of judgements as a core component of justice"
It does.
The rest of what you write isn't actually what happened, though to be fair the article sort of makes a hash of it. The trial hasn't happened yet. There is no reopening of anything, this is normal resolution of pre trial motions that happens in all lawsuits.
The lawsuit is actually moving at a normal speed (fast even. It is also the case that the time taken he is as much plaintiffs needing time as defendants) and this particular ruling is totally normal and would have happened anyway.
Your last question has a simple answer that is the same as why everyone stopped using MSG despite it turning out to not be bad for you.
- tomrod 3y agoThe rest of what the grandparent commentator wrote is both the perceived and actual outcome, regardless of why the legal system decided to wait years and years and years to execute its judgement.
- DannyBee 3y agoIt is neither. The legal system did not wait. The plaintiffs did. Because they thought they would get more through bankruptcy , similar to the opiate settlement
- skyyler 3y agoMSG is still in a huge amount of processed and restaurant food, and it’s available in a couple different forms at my local grocery store. Maybe not the best example?