DannyBee

25 ms·

301.
by DannyBee 1y ago
No. In SSA, the graphs are chordal, so were already easily colorable (relatively). Outside of SSA, this is not true, but the coloring is still not the hard part, it's the easy part.
302.
by DannyBee 1y ago
Russ didn't leave. But this is also different, AFAIK. In this case I expect it's more related to how the engineering ladder has changed at Google over time, and the effects of cost cutting placing pressure to conform to the ladder
303.
by DannyBee 1y ago
Sure, but at that point, you'd almost certainly be better off using resin.
304.
by DannyBee 1y ago
It actually is fairly filament dependent (among other things) For example, stiffer filaments can usually handle more overhang before they sag and screw things up. The easiest rule of thumb is to assume 45degrees, which works for ~all filame
305.
by DannyBee 1y ago
Thankfully, support necessity will go away as 4/5axis 3d printing comes to consumer hardware over say, 10 years. With 5 axis, you can print any model without the need for supports. (I'm well aware of the difficulties/realitie
306.
by DannyBee 1y ago
"So, they're set on doing the "wrong" thing, but could still use legal advice." As a lawyer, that is your time to exit the scene. There are no airquotes that should be around wrong here. This isn't advocacy f
307.
by DannyBee 1y ago
Two things: Don't confuse the adversarial process with the post-adversarial process. Don't confuse civil and criminal cases. On the first: The adversarial process is between two sides, maybe you and a company, or two companies, o
308.
by DannyBee 1y ago
+1 to this. In addition, one of the ironic things is that I ran engineering teams that did the equivalent of project michigan, at Google. More than once. The upsides (downsides?) of being an engineer/manager/lawyer. So i even have
309.
by DannyBee 1y ago
i'm aware of what lawyers tell you sometimes, since i am in fact, a lawyer in addition to being an engineer, but you have to think about the context as well. You aren't talking about trying to avoid another side finding it in mou
310.
by DannyBee 1y ago
Again, once you lose, the adversarial part is over. Malicious compliance is exactly why good faith is a requirement but not a defense. Bad faith will get you contempt, good faith will not save you from contempt if you didn't do enough.
311.
by DannyBee 1y ago
"Would this still be clear bad faith had these chat logs not been created?" Yes, almost certainly. The party claiming non-compliance has to prove your non-compliance, but they do not have to prove your bad faith. Instead, the bur
312.
by DannyBee 1y ago
"The most shocking thing to me about that isn't the malicious compliance, but that even after a court injunction, and fully knowing that there could be subsequent discovery, they have people putting something like that in writing.
313.
by DannyBee 1y ago
This is mostly true - but it will be used against you in future civil proceedings as well. IE this person is now useless as a witness pretty much forever.
314.
by DannyBee 1y ago
This is also wrong. Good faith is a requirement. Act in bad faith, and you can still be sanctioned. Do you have any background in this, or are you just asserting what you want reality to be? Because you are just spouting wrong information
315.
by DannyBee 1y ago
Lawyer here - that's not how these things work. This is definitely non-compliant. Injunctions are, intentionally, required only to "describe in reasonable detail the act or acts restrained or required". The key being "
316.
by DannyBee 1y ago
Everyone seems to focus on the checksumming and scrubbing. But the real win (at least for me) - every device i have - laptops, desktops, server, even PLC's (they now use freebsd under the covers + ZFS) all backup using zfs snapshots an
317.
by DannyBee 1y ago
ZFS is even used on my PLC to provide consistent snapshots. So uh, going to go with "it would probably work fine".
318.
by DannyBee 1y ago
That would be surprising - indemnification is usually very cheap to provide even for this sort of thing - there is always an insurer willing to sell you the policy you need to provide it at some reasonable price :)
319.
by DannyBee 1y ago
Sorry, maybe i was not specific enough. I meant when he pardons a meaningful us government official for violating a court order that he didn't give a shit about. In this case Joe was pardoned for criminal contempt of a court order rela
320.
by DannyBee 1y ago
Lawyer here - the true consitutional crisis will likely come when the judge holds someone in criminal contempt, and trump pardons them. There is some unfortunate precedent that allows this. At the time, the ruling was not really that conse
321.
by DannyBee 1y ago
"because with monopoly services they can hire 3x the number of developers at 3x the rate of other firms and shackle them with tools and processes that make them 1/3x as productive and survive" So, this i'd take issue wit
322.
by DannyBee 1y ago
Google is just really bad at this, but seems to think it's not bad at this. It's sad since there is no excuse for it - plenty of companies conduct regular layoffs and role eliminations in more compassionate ways, it would not tak
323.
by DannyBee 1y ago
I'd wager they didn't. Lowest person who generally will know will usually be a senior director. Sometimes director. Sometimes VP. Google is pretty careful about this. While it's true sometimes those people share stuff, it&
324.
by DannyBee 1y ago
Eh - having had to do these myself at Google for large orgs over the past few years, i would not assume it was based on merit. The cost disparities can be huge between team members and locations, and a lot of time it's being done to
325.
by DannyBee 1y ago
This is also true of course, but i'm using "best" more colloquially - let's assume it's top 10%. That would match the rough stratification of doctor salaries (accounting for specialization, etc). The average primary
326.
by DannyBee 1y ago
I agree with the vast majority of what you say. I will poke at one part: "Patient primary expectation is always to have a doctor they can trust. " I don't believe this was the expectation here - trust was not even mentioned.
327.
by DannyBee 1y ago
Of course, but that's sort of orthogonal to the patient base level expectation here.
328.
by DannyBee 1y ago
First off, you won't convince me these folks don't belong in jail. I just dont' think anything less than serious criminal penalties is going to get us anywhere anymore. But at the same time, i guess i'll be contrarian a
329.
by DannyBee 2y ago
? You still haven't pointed out a single thing the judge got wrong, and literally just relied on a bare assertion of your feelings about how it went later , which is, of course, almost totally irrelevant to whether it was fair at the
330.
by DannyBee 2y ago
I think this is a bit unfair. Who among us can really say they haven't gone off the deep end, burned every drop of good will that ever existed towards them and their projects, sued a competitor and got hilariously burned by the judge,

More ›