DannyBee

24 ms·

331.
by DannyBee 2y ago
No, the stories are very careful, but i get it - they parse words. AFAIK, he did not deny that he made romantic overtures (or whatever the hell phrase they used, i can look it up again if you care). If he denied it, i don't see it. Wha
332.
by DannyBee 2y ago
So this is "I didn't read it at all, but i'm sure it's wrong because it conflicts with my personal view" then?
333.
by DannyBee 2y ago
No, this story shows that if you ask your boss out on a date, and they say no, and your boss gets in trouble and you are the star witness, they will try to use your idiocy against you. Why do you insist on making this about one-way false cl
334.
by DannyBee 2y ago
Did you read the transcript? He actually did ask her out on a date. Maybe just don't ask your boss out on a date?
335.
by DannyBee 2y ago
or, and hear me out here: just don't ask them out on a date. If you read the court transcript, he actually did ask her out on a date and she said no :)
336.
by DannyBee 2y ago
This is true but it's not as far off as you think. In this case, the court doesn't have to just find it was a fair price, but a fair process as well. That is, the standard the defendants have to meet (not the plaintiffs, the burde
337.
by DannyBee 2y ago
Exactly why do you believe a court that does exactly this kind of judgement all the time is not capable of it? They issued a 127 page supporting decision on why they found it was a fair process that generated a fair price. Want to say which
338.
by DannyBee 2y ago
It's worth pointing out (IMHO) given the other comments that it's actually more than that - the fairness standard requires they prove the process was fair as well (IE a fair process that generated a fair price), which the court fo
339.
by DannyBee 2y ago
There are not far more types of fiber cable, there are far more types of jackets :) You are confusing the cable jacket with the fiber cable inside of it. This is the spec on the jacket they use and they didn't design this particular j
340.
by DannyBee 2y ago
"Android was nothing when the ball started rolling, which is when Apple used its leverage (and Cingular’s struggle at the time) to be as independent of the carrier as it could. The early success of the iPhone spooked Verizon, which put
341.
by DannyBee 2y ago
Here, they open sourced an entire buildable phone OS that you could build and flash on a phone and have it work. At a time when none really existed. Not even close. They also went out of their way to generate open drivers and rewrite those
342.
by DannyBee 2y ago
"I generally agree with all of this but Google wasn't the one that stopped the vendor controlled OS. That was Apple for the most part." I dunno, Early iphone did not have the market share to command this in the way it does no
343.
by DannyBee 2y ago
" It's bad faith open source because only AOSP is actually open source, and AOSP by itself is not that useful of an operating system. " So it's bad faith because they didn't open source as much as you wanted, and yo
344.
by DannyBee 2y ago
Bad faith. Holy cow is this insane. Why don't you go back to 2006 and tell me which complete open source mobile OS you want to use. An immense amount of time was spent beating up vendors and others to be able to release, as open sourc
345.
by DannyBee 2y ago
This is just G.657B3. They are all proprietary in their coatings for sure, but it's made to a standard. The only thing is that it's not guaranteed compatible with old G.652 fiber if you try to fusion splice it. You can get G.657A
346.
by DannyBee 2y ago
As i'm sure you know - for invisible installs, they don't even bother to have an outer cable anymore, just the 250um fiber with no sheath running bare on the walls. Kinda insane.
347.
by DannyBee 2y ago
This part of a node ui for modeling satisfactory (the game) factories. Mostly for fun and learning, honestly. So like, I have code to find optimal production chains and solve the node graph, using ILP through pyomo or Z3. Some of the optim
348.
by DannyBee 2y ago
What? This is 100% wrong. This is well standardized. As I posted elsewhere: G.657A1/B1 = 10mm (half an inch) G.657A2/B2 = 7.5mm (a little over a quarter inch) G.657A3/B3 = 2.5mm (less than 1/8th of an inch) The only cab
349.
by DannyBee 2y ago
G.657A1, which is basically the crappiest you would ever buy at this point, is not even half an inch bend radius.
350.
by DannyBee 2y ago
You don't need them unless you are running a mile or two of fiber - mechanical fast connectors (IE no polish, etc) are less than 0.3db loss at this point. Fusion splicing will still be 0.01db or better, but you will be well within the
351.
by DannyBee 2y ago
"And be careful of the minimum bend radius." The minimum bend radius of any good fiber is way less than cat6 at this point. G.657A1/B1 = 10mm G.657A2/B2 = 7.5mm G.657A3/B3= 2.5mm CAT6 = 25mm Flexible cat6 = 15mm. Fi
352.
by DannyBee 2y ago
The notion of replacing programmers is not well thought out most of the times i see it. At some point, you have to be able to replace all of them (or all the work they currently do), or else all you do is screw up the pipeline you need. I&#
353.
by DannyBee 2y ago
I've gotten it to write complex graph layout algorithms, including converting them to all work in the same orientation (about half of graph layout papers are written to produce vertical graphs, and about half horizontal graphs).
354.
by DannyBee 2y ago
I agree someone has to pay - but as I said, it should be in proportion to who is causing the cost. In places where it is totally flat, or even close to flat, cool, charge everyone (EV, non-EV). In places where it is not, charge everyone d
355.
by DannyBee 2y ago
This is kinda true, but places blame in the wrong place. The TL;DR is that the stress caused by EV's being heavier is miniscule in practice on any road with any meaningful truck traffic. Whoever is heaviest should be paying most of the
356.
by DannyBee 2y ago
"I do agree with it though. But I recognize that it is a different claim than the one I was putting forward as factual." Maybe the core is that i don't understand why you agree with it :) Maybe your definition of global corre
357.
by DannyBee 2y ago
This doesn't seem like we are getting anywhere on this part of the thread, unfortunately. My suggestion would be - if we are ever in the same place, let's just grab coffee or something. In the end - i suspect we are just going to
358.
by DannyBee 2y ago
Yes - I spend about half my time with rust embedded, where unsafe code is just everywhere , whether needed or not. There is still plenty in my non-embedded stuff, but a fair amount hardware-adjacent (IE i have to drive things like relay ca
359.
by DannyBee 2y ago
"The encapsulation referred to here is that you can expose a safe API that is impossible to misuse in a way that leads to undefined behavior. That's the succinct way of putting it anyway." Well, no, actually. At least, not in
360.
by DannyBee 2y ago
Hard disagree - if you violate the invariants in Rust unsafe code, you can cause global problems with local code. You can cause use-after-free, and other borrow checker violations, with incorrect unsafe code. Nothing will flag it, you wil

More ›