Dah00n

44 ms·

871.
by Dah00n 5y ago
Mac has lots and lots of inconsistencies too. Some apps, like Music.app, is also pretty much an Apple version of electron. The inconsistencies aren't better on Mac, just different ones.
872.
by Dah00n 5y ago
Really? I'd say they are closer to unreasonably irrelevant. Maybe I could stretch myself to see a Chomebook being interesting and relevant. To me seeing the other two would make me look negatively on the brands/products. If those
873.
by Dah00n 5y ago
>The hashes are hard coded into each iOS release Do you have a source on that? Since it is illegal to share those hashes in any way or form. Even people working with photo forensic and big photo sharing sites cannot get access to them. I
874.
by Dah00n 5y ago
That is not true. If you read what experts who actually do something to stop CP (unlike Apple) say there are proven false positives. https://www.hackerfactor.com/blog/index.php?/archives/929-On...
875.
by Dah00n 5y ago
Yes but so is much in that link or at least it is very biased. This one is far better: https://www.hackerfactor.com/blog/index.php?/archives/929-On...
876.
by Dah00n 5y ago
>someone who has played Bach for 20 years has a deeper understanding of (his) music than someone who listened for ten minutes See, there it is again. The snobbery. We are discussing art, not music theory. No, one that has played Bach for
877.
by Dah00n 5y ago
From what I've seen Tiktok is no worse than Instagram, Facebook or Snapchat. If anything there's less toxicity which in itself makes Tiktok better than the rest. With that said I don't use social media much (like maybe an hou
878.
by Dah00n 5y ago
>much more stimulating To you, yes. Not everyone is you though. >It does actually take a sort of literacy to understand and appreciate art. No it doesn't. It might add something (or nothing at all or detract from it) but if it is
879.
by Dah00n 5y ago
“The time you enjoy wasting, is not wasted time” - John Lennon
880.
by Dah00n 5y ago
Something more toxic than reddit? I have only seen it in sites that start as "free-speech reddit clones". Outside those I find it hard to believe anything can be more toxic than Reddit. Unless you digg really deep into niche subs
881.
by Dah00n 5y ago
HN is mostly like a good day on Facebook but once in awhile it transcends every other social media. IMO it is going downhill fast though and the really good discussions are getting drowned out by China hate, nationalism, brand loyalty, etc.
882.
by Dah00n 5y ago
>What's more important? Your right to "privacy" (which you can still invoke by simply not using iCloud) or their right to a normal life? My right to privacy of course because the other option is a strawman. What you are do
883.
by Dah00n 5y ago
Yes, exactly this. The amount of children who lost interest in a topic because of systems like this must be high. I clearly remember how I thought maths was way too easy and eventually I lost interest. Sadly I was lazy so I didn't do a
884.
by Dah00n 5y ago
> 18 U.S.C. § 2258A is specific: the data can only be sent to NCMEC. (With 2258A, it is illegal for a service provider to turn over CP photos to the police or the FBI; you can only send it to NCMEC. Then NCMEC will contact the police or
885.
by Dah00n 5y ago
Google dictates the direction no matter if you look at blink or chromium. If Google wants to dictate a future where Brave cannot possibly do the work on chromium to implement their features because Google turned the code in a direction dema
886.
by Dah00n 5y ago
Websites are either made to only be as good as what the worst browser can render or needs enough developer time to work around it. In other words as if speed limits were set to 10mph on highways because my crap SUV dictate the road for ever
887.
by Dah00n 5y ago
Doesn't that only convert to pdf? Most modern features are interactive features, like Ajax and add-on APIs. I doubt we'll ever see an interactive facebook.com in pdf, though I'm sure Adobe would love to make it happen.
888.
by Dah00n 5y ago
>However, you require a fully-features browser to browse the modern web. That isn't really true since if it were we wouldn't have had the problem of IE back in the day or Safari today.
889.
by Dah00n 5y ago
By IE you don't mean Edge I'm guessing. Do you still develop with support for IE? I haven't seen it as a requirement for some time. I hardly even look at sites in it these days. At most I add a Browser not supported banner an
890.
by Dah00n 5y ago
The most feature rich browser engine (Chromium) is the one with most adaptation across all the most used platforms so that doesn't make sense unless you count users from something like AmigaOS and TVs and in that way get Firefox out on
891.
by Dah00n 5y ago
Edge is chromium. You can test it just fine from a Mac.
892.
by Dah00n 5y ago
If up to 75% of paying customers browsing on mobile use safari would you serve them a broken website? Remember that 100% of browsers in iOS is safari. Everything else is just Safari with a skin. If I could I would block apple users out with
893.
by Dah00n 5y ago
>Three rendering engines is more than enough. It is the lack of diversity in browsers that is problematic. No, it is the lack of diversity in rendering engine that is problematic. When one rendering engine can dictate the web then it mak
894.
by Dah00n 5y ago
Tips just need to die (as being counted a part of a salary). It's only a thing in countries with poor worker protection so here's hoping they get more of that. The only country I have seen it used in was the US. My wife worked as
895.
by Dah00n 5y ago
>would the blood pump so fast that the prion(s) is already in your body. Well, I guess the question is "is it in the blood yet or not". As someone who have had lots of stuff injected into his veins multiple times (cancer treatm
896.
by Dah00n 5y ago
Disinfects a cut thumb faster?
897.
by Dah00n 5y ago
>affecting 751 people in total. That is not how terror is defined though. The amount affected by terrorism is the amount of people that get terrorised by the act, not the amount that gets sick, dies or know someone who did. Using your de
898.
by Dah00n 5y ago
What made 9/11 such a successful terrorist attack was that it made the US live in fear. That is a change (and it hasn't changed back). Terror (fear) is a perfectly fine end in itself for terrorism. The anthrax mailing caused chang
899.
by Dah00n 5y ago
> it's not effective in doing anything but news cycles. "The unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims" is a definition of terrorism. Death count is irrelevan
900.
by Dah00n 5y ago
It would make it much easier to get away with than bombs and spread way more fear. If it would work (I have no idea) it would be a very intelligent choice of weapon.

More ›