DagAgren

41 ms·

451.
by DagAgren 7y ago
And?
452.
by DagAgren 7y ago
That is understating the situation quite a bit. Volume is so non-existent that basically any attempt at exiting at all would crater the price.
453.
by DagAgren 7y ago
https://davidgerard.co.uk/blockchain/2018/04/05/debunking-bu...
454.
by DagAgren 7y ago
The only reason it works at all is that it is small and barely used by anyone at all. Scaling Lightning is an unsolved problem. It relies on finding solution to problems people have tried to solve for decades with no success.
455.
by DagAgren 7y ago
For Lightning to work at scale, we need solutions for problems that nobody on earth has solved yet, nor have any idea how to solve. Sure, it kind of sort of works for small network sizes. It will die a fiery death the second it attempts to
456.
by DagAgren 7y ago
And they are all an absolute shitshow. Nano especially is complete and utter garbage that barely holds together under the minimal usage of its tiny user base.
457.
by DagAgren 7y ago
And?
458.
by DagAgren 7y ago
It doesn't even scale to millions of users. And basically every project that tries to claim different is just ignoring the problem and trying to pump their own price. Everything in cryptocurrencies is a scam.
459.
by DagAgren 7y ago
Bitcoin's "market cap" is completely imaginary.
460.
by DagAgren 7y ago
These are scams.
461.
by DagAgren 7y ago
Unfortunately, Bitcoin as designed is technically incapable of being in widespread use for payment, due to a severe lack of network capacity, and a complete lack of interest in ever changing this. Instead, all effort is going into a buildin
462.
by DagAgren 7y ago
This is a scam, of course.
463.
by DagAgren 7y ago
This is just a phrasing of a sentence in a mail. It does not define either what reasons they are allowed to ban you for, nor does it define what reasons they will use to ban you. They are allowed to ban you for literally any reason. What ma
464.
by DagAgren 7y ago
I do know just that for apps I ship. I will never in a million year ship anything on, for instance, node.js, for exactly this reason.
465.
by DagAgren 7y ago
They can ban you for absolutely any reason whatsoever. They can ban you for using the number "4" in your code. They don't, though. And we trust them not to, because it is not reasonable behaviour and it would absolutely not m
466.
by DagAgren 7y ago
Readable and understandable diffs is not a property of text files. It is very easy to design tools and formats that use text files, yet do not give you diffs that are readable or understandable. Readability and understandability depend on m
467.
by DagAgren 7y ago
Try that again, but try the suggestion of not using latin characters any longer in favour of, say, the highly logical Korean Hangul writing system. Still as keen on the idea?
468.
by DagAgren 7y ago
Kind of a shit weapon if you have no idea what you are hitting with it innit.
469.
by DagAgren 7y ago
It is still in beta, and only runs on the newest OS versions. Nobody is required to switch to it, nor especially encouraged.
470.
by DagAgren 7y ago
I know that when I secretly test weapons, I do it in a way that makes sure the effects will be in the news 24 hours a day for weeks and months.
471.
by DagAgren 7y ago
We are in a dark age at the moment, is what I am saying, and I think we should be working at getting out of it.
472.
by DagAgren 7y ago
It is part of the Swift project, but it is not really part of the Apple development ecosystem. It might at some point be, but it is not now, and it is a small side project. And it is not, in general, used when developing for the ecosystem.
473.
by DagAgren 7y ago
Well, he gives two examples. One is a framework first released about a month ago, in a great rush. The other is a tool that is not part of normal workflows, and is basically still in development. I'm sure documentation will improve on
474.
by DagAgren 7y ago
The only two examples he gives for this "a lot" is a completely new framework that was released about a month ago, and a tool that is, honestly, still in development and not part of normal development workflows for Apple platforms
475.
by DagAgren 7y ago
We can't, because nobody will even consider giving anything new a chance if it is not Unix.
476.
by DagAgren 7y ago
When it comes to Unix, history and the present are one and the same. We have been locked into the same model, the same OS, for decades now. Unix is being developed through small, incremental changes on top of a base that is massively out of
477.
by DagAgren 7y ago
A reasonable theory, given that weapon strikes from orbit are extremely subtle and stealthy, and matches have not been invented yet.
478.
by DagAgren 7y ago
UTF-8 lets you skip entire characters without scanning the individual bytes, which VLQ does not.
479.
by DagAgren 7y ago
I struggle to imagine a situation that would be improved by adding MORE involvement by Trump.
480.
by DagAgren 7y ago
Or, it's like saying that a browser that has a built-in email client is insane. Usually, focusing on doing one thing only is how you make good products.

More ›