DTutorin

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by DTutorin 9mo ago

   That’s a fair point, and I think it’s related. Fiction has a structural advantage: it’s coherent, emotionally satisfying, and low-effort to consume. Evidence-based reasoning is fragmented, probabilistic, and often unsatisfying - especially
2. 2.▲
   Ask HN: Why do fact-based debate platforms keep failing?(fact2check.com)

   3 points by DTutorin 9mo ago|3 comments
3. 3.▲
   by DTutorin 9mo ago

   I’ve been experimenting with a small MVP that tries to structure online debates differently. The idea is simple: one claim/theory users add individual supporting or opposing facts (with sources) each fact is discussed and voted on inde
4. 4.▲
   Show HN: An experiment in fact-level discussion(fact2check.com)

   1 points by DTutorin 9mo ago|1 comments
5. 5.▲
   by DTutorin 9mo ago

   Hi HN, I’m experimenting with a minimal web platform that explores whether structuring debates into discrete facts changes how people reason about claims. Instead of long threads where everything is mixed together, each claim has: a list of