CyrusNajmabadi

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by CyrusNajmabadi 10y ago

   Sure. Write a Roslyn analyzer to help out here. Note: it's not like you can just sprinkle 'ref' on the return type of your methods willy nilly. Like 'ref'/'out' parameters, it requires you to do ver
2. 2.▲
   by CyrusNajmabadi 10y ago

   Hi David, language designer here. Can you give an example of where you'd want to take advantage of this in C#? Thanks!
3. 3.▲
   by CyrusNajmabadi 10y ago

   Hi there! C# language designer here. You can see (and participate in) the discussion on records here if you'd like: https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn/issues/10154 > Seems like it'd be a cinch to
4. 4.▲
   by CyrusNajmabadi 10y ago

   Hi there, C# language designer here. I don't really see your example in that way. Let's start with the latter one first: > bar(out *); // oops, not I; was up too late coding I'm not sure how this situation is an
5. 5.▲
   by CyrusNajmabadi 10y ago

   Hey there, C# language designer here. > Out variables seem like a mis-feature, especially when they are adding a better alternative (Tuples) in the same release. Out variables are really great when working with existing code that predate