CyberDildonics

200 ms·

1. 3031.▲
   by CyberDildonics 5y ago

   I don't understand what is difficult or non trivial about these types of databases and when people try to explain it, it usually just gets more confusing. Filtering values over time is just the same operations that you would find in a
2. 3032.▲
   by CyberDildonics 5y ago

   Twitter is already an awful user experience.
3. 3033.▲
   by CyberDildonics 5y ago

   To test kernels with QEMU, saved you a click.
4. 3034.▲
   by CyberDildonics 5y ago

   I think most people literally stay up for more than 14 hours a day.
5. 3035.▲
   by CyberDildonics 5y ago

   the statement I made in the first comment that you replied to that started this thread. I know, but it turns out you are really just upset about inflation. You haven't connected that in any real way to claims of "system planning
6. 3036.▲
   by CyberDildonics 5y ago

   It seems like you are just making a gigantic reach by saying 'money affects everything' so by some sort of hop scotch free association, inflation (the thing you actually seem to care about) affects 'social structure' (th
7. 3037.▲
   by CyberDildonics 5y ago

   So you do actually think there are "people that do the systems planning of our social structure"? Here you are just talking about inflation and implying that that is the same thing as "systems planning of our social structur
8. 3038.▲
   by CyberDildonics 5y ago

   This person is confusing rim light on materials that are not perfectly rough with the fresnel effect, which comes from refraction at orthogonal angles that leads to reflection.
9. 3039.▲
   by CyberDildonics 5y ago

   Your claim was that there are people 'manipulating our social structure' and instead of backing up a bold claim you backed off and just made the claim that people don't save enough money. If you don't want people to pu
10. 3040.▲
    by CyberDildonics 5y ago

    Instead of "people controlling our social structure" it seems like you wanted a hyperbolic way to say "people don't save enough money".
11. 3041.▲
    by CyberDildonics 5y ago

    You think they plan our social structure?
12. 3042.▲
    by CyberDildonics 5y ago

    the people that do the systems planning of our economy and social structure Who are these people and are they in the room with us now?
13. 3043.▲
    by CyberDildonics 5y ago

    I agree with both of you
14. 3044.▲
    by CyberDildonics 5y ago

    The compiler will do that for you and dividing by 2 is much clearer.
15. 3045.▲
    by CyberDildonics 5y ago

    Why ask a question if the answer is to just not do the thing you're trying to improve? If someone asks "how do I get to this place" with no other context and the advice is "stay home and do nothing" that doesn'
16. 3046.▲
    by CyberDildonics 5y ago

    That doesn't mean anything. If someone asks how to cook and you say 'just don't eat lol', that's not an answer and is just a self indulgent response based on nothing.
17. 3047.▲
    by CyberDildonics 5y ago

    No one asked if they "should write software they don't need". You are answering a question that no one would ever ask and you can't answer it because you don't have any other information other than the actual questi
18. 3048.▲
    by CyberDildonics 5y ago

    I have been happy for advice on how to reduce it going forward. You didn't do that, your solution was 'don't write software'. If someone asks for tips on organizing their kitchen and without knowing anything more than
19. 3049.▲
    by CyberDildonics 5y ago

    Imagine for a moment I think this is the problem - you are imagining a question that isn't being asked by telling someone to just not make that problem. This person asked for book on managing complexity. You are saying 'just don
20. 3050.▲
    by CyberDildonics 5y ago

    This is like someone asking how to build a simpler house and your answer is to tell them to live in the woods. If someone is trying to design a better plane, it doesn't make sense to tell them to just convince everyone asking for a bet
21. 3051.▲
    by CyberDildonics 5y ago

    This has nothing to do with the question, why are you going off on a tangent about philosophy of automation?
22. 3052.▲
    by CyberDildonics 5y ago

    Fury Road is a bizarre choice to try to make this argument. It is soaked with CG from start to finish, including CG cars, CG head replacements, CG body parts, completely CG shots, CG weather, CG sets, CG crowds, CG ground, sky replacements,
23. 3053.▲
    by CyberDildonics 5y ago

    There are a lot of bad uninformed takes in this thread, but I think this is the worst of them all. First, CG has been part of films for more than 25 years now and it isn't a "great new toy". More than that though, movies just
24. 3054.▲
    by CyberDildonics 5y ago

    35mm film comes out to about the same sharpness as a 1.5k CG image. Even with the best lenses and scanning, 35mm scanned at any resolution still doesn't get sharper than a crisp 1.5k upscaled to be at the same resolution. Even middle o
25. 3055.▲
    by CyberDildonics 5y ago

    This is an incoherent reply that has practically nothing to do with this thread.
26. 3056.▲
    by CyberDildonics 5y ago

    This article is abstract, hand waving, vague prediction nonsense in this context. It already works to have large blocks, it always has. Why don't you tell me specifically and technically where you think the bottleneck is? The CPU is a
27. 3057.▲
    by CyberDildonics 5y ago

    There aren't any advances necessary, blocks just need to be made bigger, happen more frequently or both. Bitcoin cash has 32MB blocks instead of the 700KB average that bitcoin has and monero has a dynamic system. Litecoin, dogecoin an
28. 3058.▲
    by CyberDildonics 5y ago

    What does this have to do with anything though? Why is another standard a problem to people who don't even care about the problem it solves?
29. 3059.▲
    by CyberDildonics 5y ago

    To be clear, you think that a standard data format and protocol is not worthwhile because some organizations don't release data?
30. 3060.▲
    by CyberDildonics 5y ago

    I'm not a political science expert, but I don't think obama ran last time.