2 ms·

There are a lot of bad uninformed takes in this thread, but I think this is the worst of them all. First, CG has been part of films for more than 25 years now

There are a lot of bad uninformed takes in this thread, but I think this is the worst of them all. First, CG has been part of films for more than 25 years now and it isn't a "great new toy". More than that though, movies just aren't made like this. People don't go out with a camera and try to make something sequentially, they are planned from start to finish and refined for years before actual production.

lkramer 5y ago
In all honesty, I think you're right. But I do feel something has happened. I definitely enjoy new blockbuster films a lot less then older ones. I still think fantastic films are made, but they are usually more independent films on smaller budgets, and some of them do have CGI, also obviously so, but it seldom matter. Is it a problem with how the modern film industry puts together movie? I don't know.
greedo 5y ago
I remember watching Terminator 2 when I was in film school (1991). It was shot in 1990, and the tech for the T1000 seemed incredible. Then a friend showed me how much CGI was used to clean up simple stuff that you would never have thought of. Watch the T800 (Arnold/Stuntrider) jump his Harley into the river bed. That was wire work cleaned up via CGI. Not really necessary, they could have shot a diff angle to hide it, but that's a tell as well. Movies since then have always used low-key FX and CGI for this type of journeyman stuff. The thing that makes this great is that it increases a movie's verisimilitude. Your shots don't need to mask or hide things. They can be more organic and real.