CravingLogic

4 ms·

1.
by CravingLogic 7mo ago
I just realized my original comment can be read in two ways. I was focusing on the blatant llm-sourced content. I don't think the author has even read this article so I doubt they discovered or learned anything.
2.
by CravingLogic 7mo ago
I just don't understand how people continue to do this. Are we really going to try and sell thoughtless articles as our own? With the same 4 fill-in-the-blank sentence structures? Who is impressed by this? What purpose does this serve?
3.
by CravingLogic 1y ago
Publications like this really undermine and sour academia. It's the same thing that happened to journalism.
4.
GitHub is removing the trending section(github.com)
7 points by CravingLogic 4y ago|6 comments
5.
by CravingLogic 4y ago
This feels strange. I always go to this page by default almost every day. I'm curious what the rest of the community thinks.
6.
by CravingLogic 6y ago
I'm curious what the motivation was for doing this now after supporting faker.js for 8+ years. Also, isn't faker.js a completed project? What is there to maintain?
7.
by CravingLogic 6y ago
Those certainly create a nice narrative.
8.
by CravingLogic 6y ago
100% Agree. There are 6 ridiculous reasons why click-bait titles are broken.
9.
by CravingLogic 6y ago
If you just want a csv of all your playlists right now, instead of potentially "30 days". This repo works well. https://github.com/pavel-aicradle/exportify
10.
by CravingLogic 6y ago
I'd bet that more than 95% of the US population would equate those two terms.