CosmicHorrorSam

4 ms·

1.
by CosmicHorrorSam 11y ago
Cutting through likely sarcasm, those are INCREDIBLY AWKWARD. I tried to use a very similar device for quite some time, and it's just- impossibly awkward to use. 0/10 would not recommend.
2.
by CosmicHorrorSam 11y ago
OH MAN. No, no, no. This is like saying, "Nobody is FORCING you to have a mailing address, if you don't like the Postal Service, just don't have an address!" Sure, you CAN do so, but if you do, you forego significant o
3.
by CosmicHorrorSam 11y ago
My general understanding of the difference here is that, while you're correct that we don't want any of our information- our mail, phone calls, movements, etc.- to be abused and give us problems, the issue here is that law enforce
4.
by CosmicHorrorSam 11y ago
What you said may truly capture what's necessary- we need to codify additional relationships for the digital space that enjoy this level of protection, and codify them such that violations result in criminal cases being thrown out and&
5.
by CosmicHorrorSam 11y ago
I apologize for the strong language, my intention was not to quash discussion, but to stir it up, I have many thoughts on the topic but only a short time to articulate any of them- a spirited "I disagree!" was all I could budget t
6.
by CosmicHorrorSam 11y ago
Hot dang, that last line is insightful. Some people will argue that whenever you let someone have data about yourself, you're implicitly giving access to practically everyone by virtue of often imperfect security. I believe that th