CorvusCrypto

8 ms·

31.
by CorvusCrypto 7y ago
So taking a devil's advocate approach on this... What would you think about text if you instead organized your code into logically partitioned submodules and followed a very easy to understand organization? In my opinion, when working
32.
by CorvusCrypto 7y ago
This is tired logic. The fact remains that if I go out and look up in the sky and see moving lights, I'm going to be annoyed. Airplane, satellite, whatever, it's not a good experience and it is absolutely a problem still regardles
33.
by CorvusCrypto 7y ago
That doesn't make it better imo, though someone commented under my other response to this that in reality it wouldn't be so noticeable which is good. The moment it makes a noticeable and lingering change in the sky picture, howeve
34.
by CorvusCrypto 7y ago
Hmm no. That does put me at more ease. And yeah I included that last part in the estimate for seeing up to 50, otherwise the projection would be of course up to half of all of them.
35.
by CorvusCrypto 7y ago
That's good then. And no I don't think it's uglier. You're right that many of the billboards and such are ugly but I still believe this to be ugly as well and I don't thing something being uglier invalidates it Some
36.
by CorvusCrypto 7y ago
Hmmm well I hope it's not noticeable because starlink is planning 24 orbital planes with 60 satellites per. With that it's safe to say you could see up to 50 or so of them in a night due to the constellation pattern. That's a
37.
by CorvusCrypto 7y ago
Okay that's interesting but I have to say it's also quite ugly. Is this a new trend to cluster satellites like this? If so what advantage does it bring and is it worth that ugly streak appearing in the night? I get this comment is
38.
by CorvusCrypto 7y ago
Yes that she was an agent at the time. But no that she had access to those materials. There are various levels of government access. Even if documents are marked "secret" and you have secret clearance if you don't have the pa
39.
by CorvusCrypto 7y ago
At face value it doesn't seem so crazy to charge him for this. I mean it is committing a crime by proxy as opposed to passively obtaining information from a source (the latter of which journalists should be protected for). If I give
40.
by CorvusCrypto 7y ago
I was definitely one who thought it should be so simple to follow a standard stab trim runaway and made several comments to it too. But the more it drags on the more I'm learning from the data that the procedure to correct is just bull
41.
by CorvusCrypto 7y ago
The rule is clearly stated in the swedish article that during these drives a person must be present with one hand on the controls just I'm case. Same saftey net, really, remote or not imo makes no difference
42.
by CorvusCrypto 7y ago
My whole take on this: Commands can go through message busses and be managed easily or it could just be a sequence of async requests, but regardless of what drives commands and events at that point you should have a very solid CQRS architec
43.
by CorvusCrypto 7y ago
Okay. Calm down for 1. Also the prelim data is there to review. The graph shows clearly there's a large plunge and there absolutely was a negative g report in the prelim showing that at the final few moments the trim settings from the
44.
by CorvusCrypto 7y ago
I get it. I understand everyone's frustration. In similar fashion I understand how unlikely it is a crew would have the mental capacity to deal with stick shakers, GPWS callouts, and still fix the problem and that is the tragedy here.
45.
by CorvusCrypto 7y ago
Yes I agree. And I'm pleading that everyone also recognise the other aspects of these.incidents such as improper basic procedure. It's all of the above. Edit: And remember at the end of the day, these airlines and pilots agreed to
46.
by CorvusCrypto 7y ago
Yeah I clarified in the reply that I don't think it's one or the other but all of the above. I'm trying to supplement the author's write-up, not override it. I hat that it's become a case of a single fault. It'
47.
by CorvusCrypto 7y ago
It doesn't refuse to disable. People are mixing this up with overriding control inputs. It is still possible to take MCAS out if the control loop using stab trim cutout. However when left active it does override pilot inputs. Think of
48.
by CorvusCrypto 7y ago
I think it's not just that question and this is what I dislike about the whole discussion. It's all about Boeing and no one is also asking "if proper procedure was performed for runaway stab trim (again, a generalized memory
49.
by CorvusCrypto 7y ago
This article seems to focus on things from a perspective of things from a small plane pilot. So a little wider perspective might be helpful. A 737 first off is not a Cessna like the author mentions flying. You do not get to use direct input
50.
by CorvusCrypto 8y ago
Idk, you could go with the gripen, But tbh even Sweden thinks it's a joke. Ask anyone about it and you'll hear a lot of jokes about how they are great at attacking the ground (crashing). The same types of "why the F35 and not
51.
by CorvusCrypto 8y ago
I would say Stockholm is a tech hub in Scandinavia. There I worked 45-50 hours per week. In comparison to LA where I recently moved back: I work 40 hours a week, barring any emergency that may come up. Though LA isn't really a tech hub
52.
by CorvusCrypto 8y ago
what? no they don't.. This is completely dependent on where you live. In stockholm, absolutely the roads are kept clear first in many areas, as well as the rails with plow trains. Then they have plows for the sidewalks. In Ursvik it wa
53.
by CorvusCrypto 8y ago
Hmm I often wonder why California doesn't implement a congestion tax. In Stockholm you need to pay around 4$ if you want to drive on the highway during certain hours into and out of the city. I can't say if it works to reduce cong
54.
by CorvusCrypto 8y ago
Actually in Sweden you have this also. Most people just have it removed from the contract. In the US it is the same. or you get a version that instead just says they own anything done during company time or using employer resources.
55.
by CorvusCrypto 8y ago
I think it depends on the company too. For tech companies especially in Stockholm and Malmö, It's really easy to hire developers. If it's a startup good luck getting unpaid leave during huge rushes as well as during industrisemest
56.
by CorvusCrypto 8y ago
Then just wait till next year when CCPA comes into effect.
57.
by CorvusCrypto 8y ago
Why would it be common sense? Literally nothing is written about design details. At a certain point burden will fall on the user and no it's not common sense where that point lies. Legal arguments such as this case are what concretely
58.
by CorvusCrypto 8y ago
Perhaps. Though with GDPR the framework is intentionally vague on a lot of things. You often hear about limits and design requirements and such, well those don't exist. They are just legal "best guesses" with the frameworks i
59.
by CorvusCrypto 8y ago
What's not allowed is pre-checked opt-in. As France mentioned that's not the case for google. Only a default configuration is pre-checked. The opt-in is a separate immediately seen checkbox saying you agree to data usage for perso
60.
by CorvusCrypto 8y ago
This is an interesting case. So France is essentially arguing that not only should opt-in be visible (as they mention it is on Google's create account page), but that configuration should be immediately visible as well. This will screw

More ›