3 ms·
That doesn't make it better imo, though someone commented under my other response to this that in reality it wouldn't be so noticeable which is good. The moment
by CorvusCrypto 7y ago
That doesn't make it better imo, though someone commented under my other response to this that in reality it wouldn't be so noticeable which is good. The moment it makes a noticeable and lingering change in the sky picture, however, I would hope people accept that it would be time to reduce the clutter
- Robotbeat 7y agoThis has been the case since the dawn of spaceflight. Iridium flares in particular have been noticeable even in daytime. Far less of a problem than airplane lights let alone city lights for the enjoyment of the night sky. The ISS is MUCH larger and brighter.
- CorvusCrypto 7y agoThis is tired logic. The fact remains that if I go out and look up in the sky and see moving lights, I'm going to be annoyed. Airplane, satellite, whatever, it's not a good experience and it is absolutely a problem still regardless of the comparison to other problems. However someone said it would be rare. As long as I don't look up and see non-natural moving lights in the sky I'm cool with it.
- Robotbeat 7y agoLots of people enjoy Iridium flares or ISS passes. Have satellites bothered you in the past? You’ve got to really be awed by NIMBYism extending all the way into space.
- eightysixfour 7y agoWhy do moving lights in the sky irritate you?
- perilunar 7y agoWhy? I enjoy seeing satellites and airplane lights at night. Dislike light pollution from city lights though.