Cody-99

9 ms·

31.
by Cody-99 2y ago
Making an already rough economic situation in Egypt even worse.
32.
by Cody-99 2y ago
>who were collaborating in a decade of torture; that he had to be protected by Ecuador is an utter shame. Oh come on. No matter your opinion on the whole situation you can't say sitting in an Ecuadorian embassy is torture lol. Dude
33.
by Cody-99 2y ago
>He was sent a Windows NT password hash, he ran hashcat over it, couldn't successfully reverse it, and gave up. Yeah..? He played an active role with his conspirator lol. He doesn't pretend to be some fool who accidentally got
34.
by Cody-99 2y ago
Why are some many people here spouting conspiracies lol? Manning, his partner in crime, has been out of prison and living a normal life for years but Assange is going to get disappeared for some reason? If the US government wanted to keep h
35.
by Cody-99 2y ago
Assange played an active role in breaking into government systems. He wasn't asking "can you get this for me?".
36.
by Cody-99 2y ago
Turns out taking an active role in breaking into government systems is a bad idea. The whole situation is funny because he would have been out years ago had he not done everything in his power to avoid a trial haha.
37.
by Cody-99 2y ago
> This is not because of the technology but because of broken governance. I mean it has a pretty big thing to do with it. It objectively doesn't work
38.
by Cody-99 2y ago
>It'd require scrapping the next planned Soyuz mission - it may take several months to get that ready. I believe they have to (and would) have to send it up manned. Soyuz can be launched to the ISS with no crew. The Russians sent up
39.
by Cody-99 2y ago
How tight is the "noose of the surveillance state" when it takes them years to stop groups like this? For example, the smokeloader malware mentioned in the post has been around since at least 2011 [1] [1] https://attack
40.
by Cody-99 2y ago
>In addition, Europol released information on eight fugitives suspected of involvement in dropper services and who are wanted by Germany 4 people in the initial arrests. They already have arrest warrants for at least another 8. It seems
41.
by Cody-99 2y ago
The plutonium, uranium, and other high explosives fall back to earth. Pretty tame compared to what happens if you fail to intercept!
42.
by Cody-99 2y ago
Yes..? If someone commits war crimes and posts the evidence of them doing so on the internet one would hope the ICC would take note.
43.
by Cody-99 2y ago
>Khan said the ICC’s prosecution team is also seeking warrants for Israel’s Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, as well as two other top Hamas leaders — Mohammed Diab Ibrahim al-Masri, the leader of the Al Qassem Brigades who is better known
44.
by Cody-99 2y ago
>The rules expressly do not limit how providers address the needs of emergency communications. Exactly. FCC has required emergency responders and other critical agencies to have priority for years. The new rules have zero impact on that.
45.
by Cody-99 2y ago
This is a silly argument IMO. > Or are you saying we should force the road builders to ensure the road has enough capacity to allow everyone to have a siren? I don't know why you are trying to complicate the issue with a bad analogy
46.
by Cody-99 2y ago
Makes sense. If you are offering a 'fast lane' then you are just slowing down everyone who doesn't pay.
47.
by Cody-99 2y ago
Yes..? Why would that render it useless? I don't see how vanguard would be any less effective by publishing the source code.
48.
by Cody-99 2y ago
A lot of the outrage is because how riot has acted. They have repeatedly dismissed the concerns of security experts and their community in offhand/very dismissive ways. I don't think the outrage would be anywhere nearly as bad if
49.
by Cody-99 2y ago
>In some cases. In other cases, it hasn't even happened yet. ..? By the point ISP customers receive internet they have either already paid for the service, paid a deposit, or agreed to pay for it the following month like other utili
50.
by Cody-99 2y ago
It is a double dip. The ISP customer already pays for that bandwidth and internet connection. Asking the customer to pay a second time or asking netflix to pay is clearly double dipping. Trying to call it something else is just silly! >c
51.
by Cody-99 2y ago
The ISP customers already paid for that. The ISP customer already paid for the bandwidth, hardware, and all other costs. Not sure why this is confusing for you. The ISP isn't paying more because Bob next door decides to watch netflix f
52.
by Cody-99 2y ago
It isn't netflix traffic it is ISP customer traffic which they pay for. Hardware upgrade, bandwidth costs, and other operating costs are already paid for by the ISP customers. The ISP should not be able to double dip by charging netfli
53.
by Cody-99 2y ago
>So, I would be beyond shocked if this was an election year issue of substance. Because it isn't an election year issue. This has been in the works since at least 2022. https://www.cnet.com/home/internet/net
54.
by Cody-99 2y ago
No they shouldn't. I don't think that logic makes any sense at all. No one is paying increased costs because their neighbor is watching netflix, youtube, or browsing reddit. Users already pay for internet service they shouldn&#x27
55.
by Cody-99 2y ago
Changing government policy isn't always an instant process. Most of the FCC rules go through the "notice and comment" process that takes quiet a long time. The net neutrality rule for example has been in the works since at le
56.
by Cody-99 2y ago
Except the kids aren't voters. The story I read said many were kids who didn't even know what congress was.
57.
by Cody-99 2y ago
Maybe useless was a bit strong of a word. Combined with some VPN/proxy to bypass the great firewall they of course would become functional.
58.
by Cody-99 2y ago
Honestly I'm surprised most of them were even available for download to begin with. Signal and telegram have been blocked on a network level for years so even if you could download them they were mostly useless.
59.
by Cody-99 2y ago
Saying only the wealthy and top 5% of students should receive higher education is unhinged. That might be a popular opinion on HN and libertarian land but no one can seriously argue that with a straight face lol.
60.
by Cody-99 2y ago
So only the wealthy get to receive higher education. Good one! I know this is HN but this take goes beyond the typical level of unhinged. Honestly it seems like straight up trolling. Someone who received public loans to attend university a

More ›