ChrisWint

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by ChrisWint 4mo ago

   I guess modern database systems are easily fast enough to emulate a high-end PC from the early nineties, so there is a probably a lot of untapped potential for other games as well.
2. 2.▲
   by ChrisWint 1y ago

   Depends on what you mean by "works" I guess. The statements all look like PostgreSQL SQL and should, therefore, all work. That said, they are pretty heavy duty, especially the recursive Ray tracing, so I expect it to lag quite a b
3. 3.▲
   The Decline and Fall of In-Memory Database Systems(cedardb.com)

   2 points by ChrisWint 2y ago|0 comments
4. 4.▲
   The Hidden Cost of Data Movement(cedardb.com)

   8 points by ChrisWint 2y ago|0 comments
5. 5.▲
   Reclaiming SQL's Declarative Power(cedardb.com)

   4 points by ChrisWint 2y ago|0 comments
6. 6.▲
   Can You Do Both: Fast Scans and Fast Writes in a Single System?(cedardb.com)

   3 points by ChrisWint 2y ago|0 comments
7. 7.▲
   A Deep Dive into German Strings(cedardb.com)

   6 points by ChrisWint 2y ago|0 comments
8. 8.▲
   by ChrisWint 2y ago

   Author of that blogpost here. > less "code branches" than duckdb, which may or may not translate to faster performance. In that case it was about 2.5x faster than DuckDB end to end, so a bit less than the difference in branches
9. 9.▲
   by ChrisWint 2y ago

   I can recommend the lecture for implementing database systems by Thomas Neumann, who spearheaded the Umbra system which CedarDB builds on. The slides and lecture recordings are available online: https://db.in.tum.de/teaching