ChaosDegenerate

5 ms·

1.
by ChaosDegenerate 7y ago
I'm totally ignorant in all of that, but for me it just looks like out of sudden (historically) we have way too many males. They used to be killed during hunting, wars, competition with other males. Since 1945 we haven't had that
2.
by ChaosDegenerate 7y ago
Please keep in mind, I said socio-economic status. But, homeless looking, constantly drank, smelling of urine Charles Bukowski had plenty of young, attractive and willing lovers. My point being exactly his high socio-economic status. We&#x2
3.
by ChaosDegenerate 7y ago
Of course they did. So that they can work. But don't have too. Great deal if you ask me.
4.
by ChaosDegenerate 7y ago
well, somehow the society at large has no problem with exactly opposite generalization: that women prefer to work over staying home with their kids. It is an individual matter, I agree. With most women definitely having the preference of st
5.
by ChaosDegenerate 7y ago
Yes, but also it's not like having maternal instinct wouldn't make this decision easier for you. And keep in mind, statistics say than one of the divorce factors is husband making less than wife. From her perspective: this isn&#x2
6.
by ChaosDegenerate 7y ago
The thing with female workforce participation: isn't it just symptom of the society getting poorer. My wife worked her ass off. I was making about 130k / year. She was making about 60k / year. Then we not only moved from the
7.
by ChaosDegenerate 7y ago
yeah, but they will not attempt destroying them financially too. EU fines US companies as if it wanted to get rid of them from the market. Not like it'd like to just fine them. Also, note, how during Trump presidency EU is so much more
8.
by ChaosDegenerate 7y ago
It is funny how you think there is no corruption in Brussels. Of course it is there! The rules of the game are though that we don't touch our own Corporations. So Brussels will look the other way when VW cheats their customers in the U
9.
by ChaosDegenerate 7y ago
I have no problem with the distinction you presented. The problem I have is with organizations like WHO that pathologize normal behaviors. In 2018 WHO not only added "sex" to their addiction list. They also added computer games. N
10.
by ChaosDegenerate 7y ago
To add something here: everything is considered addiction nowadays: over-eating, sex, shopping, etc. Not to derail the discussion but isn't it too much? I'm under impression that today anyone who enjoys something more than we woul
11.
by ChaosDegenerate 7y ago
What will happen to New York Times when its running sexually explicit, beheading, animal torture, etc? They will get sued. As soon as we can start suing them for the content they provide the sooner they will find resolution to it. The same
12.
by ChaosDegenerate 7y ago
Exactly my point. But for this to work, they need to be regulated by Government as utilities. No one has the right to turn off electric grid on your house because they are "private company". No one has the right to turn off "
13.
by ChaosDegenerate 7y ago
Freedom comes with responsibility. The idea that they are not responsible for the content (i.e. you can't hold Youtube/Google legally responsible for the content they have on their platforms) while at the same time they make profi
14.
by ChaosDegenerate 7y ago
Government should regulate Facebook, Google (Youtube), Twitter, etc. as utilities that they are. The current situation where the corporations aren't responsible for the content but can censor it is the best example of why they should b
15.
by ChaosDegenerate 7y ago
Graduating in Europe with Master's that cost me nothing, I always feel so bad thinking about the debt my coworkers who studied in the US have to repay. It's just so wrong and stupid. On top of that I can always go back "home&
16.
by ChaosDegenerate 7y ago
Thank you for your reply. Granted that Google, Microsoft, Facebook, and all the others collect data on us. And this is used by the Government security agencies (i.e. NSA/CIA as described by Snowden) to spy on us -- as we all know now t
17.
by ChaosDegenerate 7y ago
Will these systems be prone to false data? I.e. if an organization fighting for free speech would create software generating false personas who create false messages, and other events, would they know any better? For example, it wouldn&#x27