Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Chabsff
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
91.
▲
by
Chabsff
3y ago
The operating key word here being "agreement", which, as far as I'm concerned, is the absolute antithesis of what EA is all about.
92.
▲
by
Chabsff
3y ago
I admire your optimism. The only times section 230 has been brought up on the hill in the last decade as been in, admittedly performative and doomed to fail, calls to get rid of it entirely.
93.
▲
by
Chabsff
3y ago
Public availability of large transformer-based foundation models trained at great expense, which is what OP is referring to, is definitely unprecedented.
94.
▲
by
Chabsff
3y ago
Similar to how all the kids today only play itch.io games thanks to Unity and Unreal dramatically lowering the bar of entry into game development. Oh wait... No. All it has done is create an environment where indy games are now assumed to b
95.
▲
by
Chabsff
3y ago
No offense, but this is absolutely delusional. As long as people can "clock" content generated from these models, it will be treated by consumers as low-effort drivel, no matter how much actual artistic effort goes in the exercise
96.
▲
by
Chabsff
3y ago
It's really not. Don't get me wrong, this is insanely cool, but it's still a long way from good enough to be truly disruptive.
97.
▲
by
Chabsff
3y ago
To be fair, it makes sense when you look at the use-case that spawned margins in the first place: <h1/><h2/>, <h1/><p/>, <h3/><h4/>, <h3/><p/>, etc... I
98.
▲
by
Chabsff
3y ago
Nowadays, small essentially means realistically useable on prosumer hardware.
99.
▲
by
Chabsff
3y ago
I think the most reasonable issue many people have is that, from a utility deployment perspective, inconsistent delivery of service is bad enough in of itself and should be fundamentally actionable without having to involve any discriminati
100.
▲
by
Chabsff
3y ago
While I broadly agree with you at surface level, you are missing a piece of the puzzle. The issue is that FCC is, correctly, treating broadband as a utility at a level comparable to electricity/sewer/drinkable water. And as such
101.
▲
by
Chabsff
3y ago
Coax runs in residential houses tend not to go through conduits, and often squeeze through holes in joists just barely big enough for the cable. Not to mention that, in my experience, they also tend to involve splitters in the absolute most
102.
▲
by
Chabsff
3y ago
The befuddlement goes even farther for me. LLMs are, effectively, black-box systems that interface with the world via a stochastic parrot interface. You'd think that software engineers would be a group that easily understands how mak
103.
▲
by
Chabsff
3y ago
At the end of the day, analytical Fourier analysis doesn't get nearly as much practical use as numerical approaches, and you don't really need THAT much background to make sense of DFTs. I know that, for myself, revisiting Fourier
104.
▲
by
Chabsff
3y ago
It is fair to assume that it'll eventually stabilize at some , probably meta-stable, equilibrium.
105.
▲
by
Chabsff
3y ago
And both of them contain a bunch of protons, yet neither, nor their combination, behave like loose protons (aka Hydrogen).
106.
▲
by
Chabsff
3y ago
From what I can tell, it's a for-profit company for a single dev that is attempting to get by through nothing but GitHub Sponsorships. Said sponsorship is a requirement for using the pre-hosted files for commercial uses in a SaaS-like
107.
▲
by
Chabsff
3y ago
The head-scratcher is more like: If it's a non-profit, they (and I) would have expected a .org, which, unlike .net, has been used consistently over the years. But I get your point in general.
108.
▲
by
Chabsff
3y ago
Have... have you ever seen Goatse? (If you haven't, please don't look it up just for sake of this and take my word for it) It's the reference example for what a "shock image" is. How in the blazes is the choice of t
109.
▲
by
Chabsff
3y ago
And, especially in the context where the same result could have been achieved as easily without resorting to law-breaking, how does that constitute a license to break other laws?
110.
▲
by
Chabsff
3y ago
> The EU Data Protection Board, the European Parliament’s Research Service and the EU Council’s Legal Service say they are warning of chat controls. Ursula von der Leyen is not interested in these opinions <clown and red flag emojis&g
111.
▲
by
Chabsff
3y ago
If your system has the notion of users at all, then most of that red tape is unavoidable, no matter how privacy-respecting you are being. Either a solid and affordable PaaS solution or at the very least a single global international standar
112.
▲
by
Chabsff
3y ago
I meant error "in the code". A chunk of C that causes a signed overflow has an error in it. Seemingly, so does Rust code according to the behavior described in the post I was replying to. My point is that I question how big is the
113.
▲
by
Chabsff
3y ago
> It only does so for debug mode. In release mode, it uses modular arithmetic. So it's still treated as an error, just one that has a predictable fallback. I'm really not sure how that's much different from `-fsanitize=und
114.
▲
by
Chabsff
3y ago
Yes, you can tell the compiler to generate predictably-behaving output for non-compliant code. However, that code is not valid C anymore, but a dialect. Since this is a discussion about what C is and is not, I think it's fair to limit
115.
▲
by
Chabsff
3y ago
It's not really a question of whether or not it's feasible, but rather: If the hardware were supports such operations, would they be expressible within the language? If they are, then we should point at the accessibility of the fu
116.
▲
by
Chabsff
3y ago
A lot of that is just a property of modern OSs, with good reason, intentionally not exposing these features to userspace processes. It's not really a function of the language itself.
117.
▲
by
Chabsff
3y ago
You may think that intuitively, but actual studies actually indicate the opposite. Usage of CSAM material leads to increased risks of contacting and abusing children. This needs to be balanced against rights to privacy and expression, which
118.
▲
by
Chabsff
3y ago
Oh, my bad. Thanks for the clarification. In that case, I would heavily disagree with your suggestion. Your "chill" PM is likely actively running interference on your behalf in order to allow you to spend time on such endeavors. I
119.
▲
by
Chabsff
3y ago
> But I've got chill PM ... Have you considered that perhaps your personal perspective is not exactly representative of large swathes of the industry and that many (if not most) workers do not have the agency and/or leeway to p
120.
▲
by
Chabsff
3y ago
"integrated" in the sense that the SDK comes with a compiler, but it's not integrated in the same sense as OpenGL where the compiler is part of the driver. If you can compile that code, then you necessarily have the compiler
More ›