Certhas

32 ms·

481.
by Certhas 3y ago
Thank you, I have yet to see a workflow mentioned here that is not just as easy in jj (just conceptually different). Also learning about progress git workflows though, so that's cool.
482.
by Certhas 3y ago
I think you are misunderstanding the autocommit, but maybe I am. I think you don't need to do this after every autocommit but only before the manual ones? Isn't that how amending commits in git works? The unamended commit is no lo
483.
by Certhas 3y ago
So in your workflow you never "git commit -a"? So you have to always manually mark what you stage. Which is probably more work than always manually removing the changes you don't want to commit. The ability to rewrite older c
484.
by Certhas 3y ago
I don't see how these things are an issue in jjs design, nor do I see how staging some files is easier than splitting a commit after the fact... Check out the documentation, many of the cases you are concerned about are explicitly ment
485.
by Certhas 3y ago
Isn't the idea that you continue editing the working copy commit until you actually commit it? Also from the documentation: https://github.com/martinvonz/jj/blob/main/docs/git-comparis... &quot
486.
by Certhas 3y ago
This looks incredibly good to me. The working copy as "commit being worked on right now" is a much simpler data structure than the "working copy + stash + staging area" of git. I really hope this succeeds... VSC support
487.
by Certhas 3y ago
After reading some of the science on auditory perception it seems you are wrong. If you perceive a signal in the left ear and then get a louder signal on the right ear a few milliseconds later you will perceive this as one sound coming from
488.
by Certhas 3y ago
With simultaneously present signals... Edit: I can also tune a guitar by plucking two strings at once, but I can't by plucking them one at a time. This really has nothing to do with noticing the absence or presence of a 3ms latency dif
489.
by Certhas 3y ago
I have both signals coming in at the same time and can superimpose them. Completely different situation. Like tuning strings by hearing when you can pluck both strings at the same time, vs doing it using absolute pitch.
490.
by Certhas 3y ago
I do absolutely not doubt a 3ms difference in timing being perceptible with two rythmic signals. I absolutely do doubt a 3ms latency though. You are claiming that someone can tell the difference between playing the game oneeter or two metre
491.
by Certhas 3y ago
You can set up a double bound really easily for this. Play on speaker, and have someone move the speaker a couple of metres. See if you really can tell whether it has been moved.
492.
by Certhas 3y ago
Sorry, but: 3ms is how long it takes sound to travel a meter. Do you notice the difference in audio/video sync between sitting in the front or the back of the cinema?
493.
by Certhas 3y ago
On the contrary, these grants are extremely competitive and prestigious.
494.
by Certhas 3y ago
In that case, we are not disposing of any principles (as you originally claimed) when we have an uncaused first cause at t = -13.6 Billion years, instead of having at t = - infinity.
495.
by Certhas 3y ago
Unless they are partners as subcontractors, this would still show up as EU-based funding here. And they can definitely participate in normal grants as partners. Not sure what exact rule you have in mind.
496.
by Certhas 3y ago
The EU is a tiny part of Fraunhofer funding: General Finances: https://www.fraunhofer.de/en/about-fraunhofer/profile-struct... Research Funding Figure: < https://www.fraunhofer.de/en/about-f
497.
by Certhas 3y ago
I mean... that's a pretty superficial reading of the situation. Where do you stop? If you assume Newtonian time, which extends back to minus infinity... well, what caused time to exist at all? Also, no one is "lazily tossing it as
498.
by Certhas 3y ago
I don't know why you are being downvoted... do people disagree that this _is_ an assumption?
499.
by Certhas 3y ago
Why is t in (-infinity, +infinity) less mysterious than t in (0, infinity)? There is no reason to assume that everything has a cause. It is perfectly logically consistent to have things without cause in the universe.
500.
by Certhas 3y ago
Left open interval is the right way to view it. There is no contradiction or paradox here. Merely unfamiliarity. But maybe you should not expect the rules of the early universe to be very familiar...
501.
by Certhas 3y ago
It's not a fixed point of the equations, though. That is technically incorrect and also not the right intuition. It's the exact opposite. It's a point at which the acceleration of (the density of) all particles diverges, and
502.
by Certhas 3y ago
It's unclear what exactly you have in mind, but the equations of GR simply predict that the topology of space-time is not that of R^4, but includes boundaries at finite (temporal) distance, so-called space-like singularities [1]. This
503.
by Certhas 3y ago
From the articles' description, it sounds like a hodgepodge of discredited ideas. Maybe unsurprisingly: If you add _all_ of them, you get enough wiggle room to evade observational constraints...
504.
by Certhas 3y ago
It is notable how much news-coverage this received (for understandable reasons [1]) relative to the almost simultaneous disaster in the Mediterranean [2], where a shipwreck killed hundreds of people. [1] What springs to mind: Dramatic searc
505.
by Certhas 3y ago
If you're in the EU your web based online banking requires 2FA which is typically provided by phone biometry+app. No idea if these work on Lineage, etc...
506.
by Certhas 3y ago
No it's not. The recovery strategy when you've gotten your repo into aess is "wipe, clone, restore local backup, try the git thing again". But even then, what's the benefit of using a strange git command, which mean
507.
by Certhas 3y ago
Nobody claims that git is impossible to use. It clearly isn't or it wouldn't be so successful. But it could demonstrably be better and easier and we are stuck in a local minimum of a good enough solution because of the network eff
508.
by Certhas 3y ago
That's incorrect. Git considers files tracked if they are in the last commit or staged. As far as I am aware it considers files untracked if they are not tracked and not ignored (though git clean -x documentation suggests that it consi
509.
by Certhas 3y ago
This meme needs to die. That is one tiny component of the data git touches when working with it. There are many sources of interacting states, some internal to git, some not: the local tree of commits remote trees of commits a possi
510.
by Certhas 3y ago
I would have loved for gitless to become a mainstream way of using git. Unfortunately it did not... Maybe one could implement the gitless workflow in VSCode to help it take off? I still think their basic analysis and the reduction in state

More ›