Caylio

8 ms·

1.
by Caylio 4y ago
K
2.
by Caylio 5y ago
No, some were better.
3.
by Caylio 5y ago
Nobody said that skill was sufficient to win, I am simply pointing out the obvious fact that it's still required (in response to nkrisc who claimed that no skill was required at all, only luck).
4.
by Caylio 5y ago
Your "big" difference is useless and changes nothing to the topic at hand. Nkrisc claimed that no skill was required at all, only luck, which is clearly false. I was just pointing out this obvious fact. Nice strawman attempt thoug
5.
by Caylio 5y ago
Every winner will have made a skillful shot, hence a skillful shot is required to win. It's a combination of both therefore you obviously can't claim no skill is required at all. Nobody says that a slot machine is a game of skill
6.
by Caylio 5y ago
The machine can only "decide to let you win" if you have the skill to get close, otherwise no chance.
7.
by Caylio 5y ago
"extensive"
8.
by Caylio 5y ago
If you don't link to the thread, everyone will prefer to disregard what you say.
9.
by Caylio 6y ago
Yes, treated like people that can be replaced by robots.
10.
by Caylio 6y ago
He is proving his point by contradicting himself, a true mathematician.
11.
by Caylio 6y ago
This one: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25557631
12.
by Caylio 6y ago
Its the DK effect in action.
13.
by Caylio 6y ago
You just fed one
14.
by Caylio 6y ago
But by his definition, this would be an evil thing to do.
15.
by Caylio 6y ago
Then you are not Catholic
16.
by Caylio 6y ago
Having equality signs at each step does not mean you can reverse the steps. You need bidirectional implication for that.
17.
by Caylio 6y ago
Mathematical problem solving by Alan Shoenfield
18.
How Genetic variation gives rise to differences in mathematical ability(journals.plos.org)
2 points by Caylio 6y ago|0 comments
19.
by Caylio 6y ago
The same could be said about your comment.
20.
by Caylio 6y ago
Grammar nazi.
21.
by Caylio 6y ago
That's a consequence of the axiom of choice, which has historically been a highly controversial axiom.
22.
by Caylio 6y ago
That's assuming pi is a normal number, which has not been proven.
23.
by Caylio 6y ago
Or perhaps she was not good enough and was not given any preferential treatment.
24.
by Caylio 6y ago
"Many topics in maths and engineering are very intuitive to pick without formal education." Name one university level math topic to back up this silly claim.
25.
by Caylio 6y ago
"Many topics in maths and engineering are very intuitive to pick without formal education." Name me a single university level math topic that backs up this claim.
26.
by Caylio 6y ago
Do you get payed exactly the same as your US coworkers? If not, is they pay still better than at canadian companies?