CRConrad

35 ms·

751.
by CRConrad 2y ago
Either 1) Those Crowdstrike unit files aren't ebpf probes, so the whole subject of ebpf probes is irrelevant here; or 2) They're obviously able to stop the rest of the kernel from even booting up (as Crowdstrike so convincingly de
752.
by CRConrad 2y ago
Jepp, that's precis som på svenska, där “dig” uttalas “dej”. But AIUI you can see from old songs and poems, by which words it was used to rhyme with, that the spelling is how it used to be pronounced not so many centuries ago. (And yes
753.
by CRConrad 2y ago
> Visual Basic nailed it, for me. Nothing has felt that intuitive for me since. Ever tried Delphi (or nowadays, Free Pascal / Lazarus)? I first encountered Visual Basic, and it felt... Almost there. Then i encountered Delphi, and
754.
by CRConrad 2y ago
> So we shouldn't use AI at all because it's often inaccurate? Preferably not, yeah.
755.
by CRConrad 2y ago
That's the same fallacy as the author of the article: No, Google doesnt “think you are an 18th century English criminal”, any more than it thinks the author “was a dead physicist”. It knows that he, the 18th century English crimina
756.
by CRConrad 2y ago
> with a vanishingly tiny percentage of them being able to eke. Yeah, really: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/eke_out#English > out a meagre living from it.
757.
by CRConrad 2y ago
> > The servers are currently in Germany > With what company? All good if it's a EU company like Hertzner, but it can still give GDPR headaches if you are hosting on e.g. AWS in Frankfurt because Amazon is still a US company.
758.
by CRConrad 2y ago
Or, come to think of it, is the phrase "the subject was broached in the discussion" what I was thinking of? Note the 'o', not 'e'. Sorry, now I'm thinking I was wrong above.
759.
by CRConrad 2y ago
Lotus... Notes? ;^>
760.
by CRConrad 2y ago
If they were in his actual dwelling(s), then animal trap seems unlikely -- most critters would shy way from the smell of human, I'd think.
761.
by CRConrad 2y ago
Yeah, and I answered. Did I ever say you were guessing??? It's just that the best reply you got was a(n educated) guess; that's the best you can get, until and unless the original commenter themselves replies. So you can take
762.
by CRConrad 2y ago
Sigh. I was hoping not to have to add a "/s", "jk", or smiley.
763.
by CRConrad 2y ago
> To modern ears it sounds like a word order chosen by someone whose first language is completely outside of the Romance/Germanic language families that English straddles. No, that's perfectly ordinary current word order in m
764.
by CRConrad 2y ago
And that was less than a hundred years ago.
765.
by CRConrad 2y ago
> As for "having multiple children leads to downward mobility" -- I'm not saying it's wrong, but I'd like to see some actual data on that. I thought the pattern was more "first son inherits, second son goes
766.
by CRConrad 2y ago
> very high genetic factor with 90% of identical twins both having T2DM Or both not having it, I hope?
767.
by CRConrad 2y ago
Gonna be a decidedly "low-brow"(1) look. (Do it! :-) (1): As in, very low forehead.
768.
by CRConrad 2y ago
Typo for DJT?
769.
by CRConrad 2y ago
It's just a silly affectation.
770.
by CRConrad 2y ago
I'm guessing the "wow" meant something like "Huh, 'meritocracy' -- that's rich, coming from the guy born with an emerald spoon in his mouth." HTH!
771.
by CRConrad 2y ago
Well yeah, he's really being totally honest there: > > Elon Musk [...] says he doesn’t ‘subscribe to cult of personality’ Of course he doesn't subscribe to the cult of anyone else's personality; he wants everyone el
772.
by CRConrad 2y ago
Paywalled. Archive link: https://archive.md/VBJEV
773.
by CRConrad 2y ago
Nobody knows, and that is the Foundation's obvious intention. [ETA:] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41054995 [/ETA] Bryan Lunduke's report on it: https://lunduke.locals.com/post/589
774.
by CRConrad 2y ago
You seem to have missed the point of the comment you replied to rather entirely. What was "simultaneous[ly] hilarious and frightening" was that the "minutes" on the linked page said absolutely nothing about what was a
775.
by CRConrad 2y ago
AFAIK, the word "breached" can also be interpreted as "brought up in discussion". So maybe that was what the GP meant.
776.
by CRConrad 2y ago
Well, the Gnome Foundation sure seems to be sailing up as a candidate...
777.
by CRConrad 2y ago
Yeah, I saw that too. Not about to get a posting ID there, so I'll say here what I thought there: > I worry that it could start unnecessary drama. What that commenter apparently missed was the worse possibility (or probability), th
778.
by CRConrad 2y ago
And it seems to have had the intended effect: Several people here(1) have been reading it as if that was the "cause". Weasel wording at its finest. (1): Including, it seems, poster "isantop". Who is otherwise coming of
779.
by CRConrad 2y ago
> If you use GNOME, you have inherent trust in that administration as the governing body for the software on your computer. Yeah... And this goes to show how misplaced that trust is. > If you don't use GNOME, why is this interest
780.
by CRConrad 2y ago
And it's not as if that gives anyone on the CoC committe who has it in for him a motive to leave those resolutions pending forever, now is it...?

More ›