Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Buldak
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
61.
▲
by
Buldak
7y ago
So what's the interpretation that will make one false and the other true?
62.
▲
by
Buldak
7y ago
>I could never do that on carb diet. Have you tried? I always run before eating (not as part of a regimen, it's just convenient), as I expect many do. And my diet is closer to inverse-keto than keto.
63.
▲
by
Buldak
7y ago
>It "worked" only if the definition is "it removed it from Reddit". There are plenty of people who thought that it wouldn't work to that extent, either. They claimed that allowing a subreddit for toxic topic X at
64.
▲
by
Buldak
7y ago
Even if China is guilty of worse than the United States, it's not clear to me that that should be salient to Americans. I'd submit that, although China is constantly presented as a rival, Americans are much more likely to be harme
65.
▲
by
Buldak
7y ago
Am I missing something or does the word "Glut" in the title here mean the opposite of what the article describes?
66.
▲
by
Buldak
7y ago
I've seen this trope around for a while now, that is, people who insist that it's somehow incorrect to say, "I don't believe in global warming" or "I don't believe in evolution." I used to find this
67.
▲
by
Buldak
8y ago
I bike and run, and like you appreciate how gentle cycling is on one's body. With that said, I don't worry about getting killed while running the way I do while cycling (i.e. by cars).
68.
▲
by
Buldak
8y ago
>if they veer into your lane and you hit them, good luck trying to get out of that I don't doubt that your description of driver psychology is largely correct, but this statement in particular is pretty far from reality. In practice
69.
▲
by
Buldak
8y ago
The "fun" aspect is one of the reasons I'm skeptical of arguments that driving stick is somehow safer. That is, I suspect that nowadays, in America anyway, car enthusiasts self-select for driving stick to the extent that we c
70.
▲
by
Buldak
8y ago
I've thought there are three ways to view the Principle of Charity, depending on what you think its aim is. The exegetical aim is to accurately determine the author's belief or intention. The pragmatic aim is to conduct the most f
71.
▲
by
Buldak
8y ago
One thing that struck me about Tyler Shultz is that (as the book emphasizes) he is the grandson of George Shultz, former Secretary of State and Theranos board member. Can you imagine trying to defend yourself against Theranos as a regular J
72.
▲
by
Buldak
8y ago
My impression from the author's description of her friends is that they aren't broke either. >I often hear my friends say, “I’m too poor” when they’re frustrated about what they can’t have. Maybe it’s a trip they can’t afford,
73.
▲
by
Buldak
8y ago
Every mass shooting or act of terror nowadays is met with calls not to lend exposure or notoriety to the perpetrators. Often I find it hard not to view such exhortations cynically (I suspect an ulterior motive when someone like Ben Shapiro
74.
▲
by
Buldak
8y ago
That's irrelevant as far as the designation of "science" is concerned. This is a question of knowledge and certainty, not practical application. The point is that results in cosmology (and other fields) are very well confirme
75.
▲
by
Buldak
8y ago
It's funny how different aspects of one's identity hang together. You'd think that diet should have little to do with someone's views on politics or gender, but when I learned that Jordan Peterson adhered to an all beef
76.
▲
by
Buldak
8y ago
Yes, it's hard not to think that the subtext here is a kind of quietism in service to the status quo.
77.
▲
by
Buldak
8y ago
When I was a student I had this same experience peer-editing prose. In reading a classmate's paper, I found endless nits to pick about syntax and minute points of diction or style, but much less to say about the actual argument. The ma
78.
▲
by
Buldak
8y ago
>You can study lots of vocabulary to achieve better results on the verbal section of the GRE or similar tests. But afterwards, you will, in fact, have better vocabulary, I submit. Yeah, but tests like the GRE claim to predict academic pe
79.
▲
by
Buldak
8y ago
I've wondered if CostCo works along this principle. People like the idea of getting bulk rates for items. But even in cases where items really are cheaper per unit, it may not be an advisable purchase for most people if they don't
80.
▲
by
Buldak
8y ago
Yeah, I wonder of "tinkering" isn't bound to diminish with technological progress. If things like cars and computers become more sophisticated over time, presumably that pushes them progressively beyond the abilities of layme
81.
▲
by
Buldak
8y ago
Do we not have ample research by now as to the inefficacy and harms of corporal punishment? What serious evidence is there on the other side? It also strikes me as something of a bad joke to suggest that we might have become uncritically pr
82.
▲
by
Buldak
8y ago
Concern for "bodily integrity" might compelling if abstaining from vaccines didn't harm anyone else, or if the subjects weren't children unable to make informed medical decisions for themselves; obviously neither of thos
83.
▲
by
Buldak
8y ago
Long hours are intrinsic to endurance sports, though. An avid cyclist or runner will easily spend ten hours or more training each week. By contrast, I doubt many people put that much into beer league softball or pick up basketball. (It'
84.
▲
by
Buldak
8y ago
I run and bike, and I've wondered about this too. Running seems like it should be the most affordable sport, but in America, at least, runners tend to be affluent. Perhaps wealthy areas are more hospitable to running, but I don't
85.
▲
by
Buldak
8y ago
This is important to consider, but even if anti-car policies inadvertently exclude some people, I'd push back against the presumption that they are more exclusionary than pro-car policies. They might still represent an improvement over
86.
▲
by
Buldak
8y ago
What "anti-natalist" policy are you referring to?
87.
▲
by
Buldak
8y ago
The researchers found that Republicans shared more fake news than Democrats, but they suggest that is only because recent fake news has been largely directed to support Trump (i.e. that age-susceptibility to fake news is otherwise ideologic
88.
▲
by
Buldak
8y ago
This could be said of many more crimes than hate speech.
89.
▲
by
Buldak
8y ago
I suppose nothing could be more "default," necessarily, than reproducing.
90.
▲
by
Buldak
8y ago
Can you provide some examples?
More ›