BubRoss

93 ms·

931.
by BubRoss 7y ago
What about using your money electronically without permission from a large organization?
932.
by BubRoss 7y ago
I'm with you, but this is a really poor way to engage with people.
933.
by BubRoss 7y ago
This article is long winded, very hyperbolic and incredibly self righteous. Take a look and tell me I'm wrong.
934.
by BubRoss 7y ago
This sounds a lot like people living in New York all their life and saying that the planet is overpopulated and that there is no space left. What you are saying might apply to the bay area, but it doesn't apply to almost anywhere else.
935.
by BubRoss 7y ago
Fire fighters are heros but the man who designs a house that never burns down is forgotten.
936.
by BubRoss 7y ago
The name was "GAY BOYS" in case you want to save a click.
937.
by BubRoss 7y ago
People knew about that though - slashdot had articles on echelon collecting emails 20 years ago but it just didn't make enough of a splash.
938.
by BubRoss 7y ago
Using all your cores for the same workload would mean it finishes faster or finishes in the same time with significantly lower frequency. It saves power and heat. Your example would mean using more cores for the same amount of time, which
939.
by BubRoss 7y ago
If people got their game on Steam and got to keep it, how did Epic cut it and how did people get screwed over? For the Kickstarter, did people pay to buy the game and not get it while not being refunded? We're they promised a copy of
940.
by BubRoss 7y ago
To be clear, a game was on Steam, Steam took people's money, Steam let the game be removed from people that bought it, Steam didn't give people their money back, and people blame Epic?
941.
by BubRoss 7y ago
The faster a CPU finishes, the faster the CPU can sleep, which is how you save battery life. The more cores you use the lower the CPU frequency can be, which saves power, since frequency increases do not use power linearly. I think it goes
942.
by BubRoss 7y ago
Shouldn't they be mad at Steam for cutting access to a game they bought? Why aren't they mad at the company that bait and switched them?
943.
by BubRoss 7y ago
How is anyone being 'fucked over' by Tim Sweeney? He is a legendary programmer who built his company up using his own significant programming abilities.
944.
by BubRoss 7y ago
Why is that an acceptable way to handle it?
945.
by BubRoss 7y ago
You don't want to use all your cores to run things faster?
946.
by BubRoss 7y ago
I've tried working like that and it makes a massive difference. To be able to visualize all the intermediate stages is valuable because they are basically never right until you are able to isolate and refine them individually. https:&
947.
by BubRoss 7y ago
This is not true at all. I think you might mean memory latency. Modern CPUs are primarily designed around memory latency. Very few programs are limited by memory bandwidth. At that point you have done a good job of optimizing already.
948.
by BubRoss 7y ago
Ask college athletes.
949.
by BubRoss 7y ago
You do realize that floating a family member's body down the Ganges is considered a sacred ritual and that what you just said has nothing to do with mass deaths due to negligence right?
950.
by BubRoss 7y ago
Are you comparing a polluted river to the deaths of millions?
951.
by BubRoss 7y ago
Relax, he was clearly talking about the Chinese government, not Chinese people in general.
952.
by BubRoss 7y ago
How does that share data between multiple Redis processes?
953.
by BubRoss 7y ago
Doesn't that end up duplicating lots of data and work since the processes are independent? They don't share data do they?
954.
by BubRoss 7y ago
If redis isn't multi-threaded the more cores and threads you have, the less CPU usage the machine would show, even if Redis is being stressed.
955.
by BubRoss 7y ago
Mathematically we know it works.
956.
by BubRoss 7y ago
> try not to simplistically and chauvinistically reduce it to "TMA sux, MMA rox" which is silly to say. Show me where I said that. > "submissions" won't exist in that dark alley at 3am... It's run away, d
957.
by BubRoss 7y ago
First, this guy has said that he is not exceptional at MMA. If you watch his fights you see that they aren't competitive. It is clear he isn't being pushed, a few strikes and the other guy gives up, usually without having been a
958.
by BubRoss 7y ago
You are mixing 'value' with fighting effectiveness. Value to people for fitness, focus or whatever else is separate and not what is being talked about now. This guy is a political target because he demonstrates that TMA don&#x27
959.
by BubRoss 7y ago
They are mostly nonsense for any real fighting because they aren't full contact and aren't practiced with a resisting opponent. Traditional martial arts don't accomplish the things you listed. We now know from MMA that the
960.
by BubRoss 7y ago
It all made perfect sense to me. I'm not sure why people get so upset about it. I suspect people can't tell the difference between the arbitrage that will happen no matter what (Chicago to New York, etc.) with the front running t

More ›