Bridged7756

6 ms·

31.
by Bridged7756 6mo ago
I suppose their market is one click deployments. Maybe for non technical people or people not willing to deal with infra.
32.
by Bridged7756 6mo ago
You're relying on the public's sentiment as a metric. The public's sentiment is, more than often, skewed, influenced by marketing, or flat out wrong. That is not a good metric to rely on. Did it ever occur to you that the eve
33.
by Bridged7756 6mo ago
Feedback loops require a deterministic metric for success. You are doing the equivalent of using a slot machine to decide whether something is right or wrong.
34.
by Bridged7756 6mo ago
I wouldn't say the same but it's pretty close. At this point I'm convinced that they'll continue running the marketing machine and people due to FOMO will keep hopping onto whatever model anthropic releases.
35.
by Bridged7756 6mo ago
FYI if you have an older kindle you possibly can jailbreak it and getting KoReader on in. Even newer Kindles can be jail broken, provided they're on the right version.
36.
by Bridged7756 6mo ago
Mirrors my sentiment. Those tools seem mostly useful for a Google alternative, scaffolding tedious things, code reviewing, and acting as a fancy search. It seems that they got a grip on the "coding LLM" market and now they're
37.
by Bridged7756 6mo ago
Yeah it seems so. Anthropic has entered the enshittification phase. They got people hooked onto their SOTAs so it's now time to keep releasing marginal performance increase models at 40% higher token price. The problem is that both Ant
38.
by Bridged7756 6mo ago
True, let's not criticize those saints of ours.
39.
by Bridged7756 6mo ago
I've been warning people of Anthropic's astroturfing for a while now. The amount of "Insert latest model/Claude Code is scary. I'm worried about my job" posts, followed by a doom ridden writing about how their
40.
by Bridged7756 6mo ago
No they don't. To be able to "check one's work", implies that they can be held accountable, that they can tell apart right from wrong, when in reality they're merely text predictors. If you think an LLMs can check t
41.
by Bridged7756 6mo ago
Efficiency doesn't make as much money. It's in big LLM's best interest to keep inference computationally expensive. I personally think the whole "the newest model is crazy! You've gotta use X (insert most expensive
42.
by Bridged7756 6mo ago
No, you're forgetting the never ending world shattering models being released every couple of months. Each one with 2X token costs of course, for a vague performance gain and that will deprecate the previous ones.
43.
by Bridged7756 6mo ago
Its enshittificating real fast. They'll just keep releasing model after model, more expensive than the last, marginal gains, but touted as "the next thing". Evangelists will say that they're afraid, it's the future,
44.
by Bridged7756 6mo ago
Btw are you from Oaxaca? Nice to see another Mexican in here.
45.
by Bridged7756 6mo ago
It's pretty much all personal preference. You can do anything with css modules, or use any other CSS extension. I don't ever recall hearing about the specific, tangible benefits tailwind brings. Just a loose "it's faster
46.
by Bridged7756 6mo ago
UI Design is an art. Like any other art, it's bound to have constant currents and counter currents. More than the designer's whims, it's the population's need for novelty, generational differences, and the desire of comp
47.
by Bridged7756 6mo ago
Not really. They're still non deterministic language predictors. Believing that a prompt is an effective way to actually control these machines' actual behavior is really far fetched. They com like that from factory. Hardcoded to
48.
by Bridged7756 6mo ago
A slot machine isn't valid criteria for determining code's correctness.
49.
by Bridged7756 6mo ago
I don't understand the appeal of parallel agent programming. Even Opus is often outputting wrong shit, or questionable code, I have to manually fix, refactor because it's quicker done that way. What do you get from parallel agents
50.
by Bridged7756 6mo ago
I personally find that LLMs help me store my mental energy to later put into more (personally) fruitful endeavors. Instead of being too tired to contribute to OSS, write, do other things at the end of the day, I find I can leave more juice
51.
by Bridged7756 6mo ago
I wonder what happens if you just decide not to pay. Surely that would have some legal implications in the US, but what about elsewhere?
52.
by Bridged7756 6mo ago
No. I believe all major cloud providers are Pay As You Go. I think only Azure has a tier where you can run on free credits for a while.
53.
by Bridged7756 6mo ago
My thoughts exactly. If whatever i wanted it to do was so unimportant that I can trust this thing to have full control over it and to do it successfully why even do it anyways? The risks of giving it full unparalleled API key access and co
54.
by Bridged7756 6mo ago
No. They want you to believe in the hype and that LLMs are the death of programmers and limitless. OpenClaw and other such agents are sold as a tool that "can do anything" but behind the scenes, the implication is still that big L
55.
by Bridged7756 6mo ago
The world has seen enough weather apps. We all could live in fantastical universes where CEOs tell the truth and shareholders put other things over profits, but that's not the case. Another such case of a fantastical world, that conten
56.
by Bridged7756 6mo ago
It's just an excuse. Classic open source rug pull here.
57.
by Bridged7756 7mo ago
I just don't see it. What's truly sad is that a field allegedly filled with technically proficient people is filled with trend chasing and FOTM trends. To this day, people with nuanced takes are far and between and most people eit
58.
by Bridged7756 7mo ago
In the future Claude will keep a tight ship on dissenters. If your monthly quota doesn't exceed the 10k worth of tokens your employer will be notified and you will be flagged as a "dissenter". Your lease will be cancelled, be
59.
by Bridged7756 7mo ago
At this point picking Node for a backend is a foot gun. Large companies have the funds for private, security vetted npm repositories, but what about small companies, startups, personal projects? Pnpm makes things more secure without install
60.
by Bridged7756 7mo ago
I'll agree with that, and you would think it's common sense for any competent engineer, but for many people it's just an afterthought. Including senior and lead engineers. General matters like security are a political liaiso

More ›