BrianneLee011

5 ms·

1.
by BrianneLee011 2mo ago
I posted a GitHub repo recently : https://github.com/BraveAnn011/ai-halo-valuation-bias It started with a simple question, and I thought it was done. But now I think it is not that easy. What made the model change its a
2.
by BrianneLee011 2mo ago
"btw. I have designed a few" ---> Love to see them. Can you share?
3.
by BrianneLee011 2mo ago
S4 is no human, no outfit, but only materials (jewelry itself), it's was unclosed photo than the human shot, so could be different though. Any suggestions for the control setting?
4.
by BrianneLee011 2mo ago
Yes, it doesn't matter. AIs read the outfit not the materials. It if reads the materials, the price should be the same across S1-S4.
5.
by BrianneLee011 2mo ago
Haha, now I got it. That's the hope. Thanks!
6.
by BrianneLee011 2mo ago
???
7.
by BrianneLee011 2mo ago
Thanks for heads-up! It looks like my account triggered the automated filter from replying quickly. I've emailed the HN mods to un-dead the comments!
8.
by BrianneLee011 2mo ago
Really appreciate the perspective. You're spot on that fine jewelry acts as a Veblen good where provenance, branding, and setting drive price far more than raw materials. Where we saw the model failure mode wasn't just that they g
9.
by BrianneLee011 2mo ago
Thanks! The stimuli images (S1-S4, S4 is unclose though) were specifically shot at 1536px resolution so the chain links, texture, and drop are clearly legible. Appreciate you taking a look at the repo stimuli!
10.
by BrianneLee011 2mo ago
Haha, fair point! It took me "6 months (taken in February) of planning to end up using my own terrible phone photos.
11.
by BrianneLee011 2mo ago
You're right that pricing from raw pixels is noisy! that’s why I included the isolated flatlay (S4 - No human, No outfit, only jewelry itself) as a baseline control! I wasn't testing if models get absolute ground-truth prices corr
12.
by BrianneLee011 2mo ago
I wanted to see how much environmental and framing cues distort object valuation in vision-language models. I bought a $2.43 chain necklace and $0.71 earrings on Temu, photographed them across three outfits (tailored blazer, party dress, re
13.
Show HN: I put a $2.43 necklace on 3 outfits. VLMs priced it at $19 to $104(github.com)
18 points by BrianneLee011 2mo ago|24 comments
14.
Show HN: 3,225 trials of LLMs guessing author age – confident and wrong(github.com)
2 points by BrianneLee011 3mo ago|0 comments
15.
by BrianneLee011 5mo ago
A next-gen platform should be just be 'GitHub w/a Chatbot." It needs to be a verification engine that treats code as a liability and human attention as the rarest resource in the building.
16.
More Tokens Isn't More Intelligence(briannelee.substack.com)
2 points by BrianneLee011 5mo ago|0 comments
17.
by BrianneLee011 6mo ago
The real story isn't Vercel. It's that a Context.ai employee got infostealer'd in February and four months later that single compromise propagated through an 'Allow All' Google Workspace OAuth grant into Vercel&#x27
18.
by BrianneLee011 6mo ago
COVID vaccines target a relatively static spike protein. Since pancreatic tumors are genetically diverse, is the "personalized" approach for every patient scalable, or will it remain a boutique treatment for the wealthy?
19.
by BrianneLee011 6mo ago
By focusing on mathematical verification, this method aims to solve the trust deficit in mission-critical AI systems, moving beyond probabilistic RAG solutions.
20.
by BrianneLee011 6mo ago
We should clarify 'Scaling up' here. Does higher token consumption actually correlate with better accuracy, or are we just increasing overhead?
21.
by BrianneLee011 6mo ago
A founding father of computer science has passed away. Thank you for building the foundations that made modern AI possible.