Boulth

39 ms·

451.
by Boulth 8y ago
Account ID is only personal info if it can be tracked back to a person. Source: https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection/refo...
452.
by Boulth 8y ago
Yes. > Personal data that has been de-identified, encrypted or pseudonymised but can be used to re-identify a person remains personal data and falls within the scope of the law. Solution: > Personal data that has been rendered anonymo
453.
Migration from GCM to Google FCM silently enables analytics(twitter.com)
2 points by Boulth 8y ago|1 comments
454.
by Boulth 8y ago
How about this: > Examples of personal data > [...] > an Internet Protocol (IP) address; Source: https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection/refo...
455.
by Boulth 8y ago
I assume you mean you use only IPv6? Unfortunately I'm away from the real computer but I guess you could run a simulation like that (try to build rainbow table and see how fast it goes).
456.
by Boulth 8y ago
> Provided your company doesn't specifically target its services at individuals in the EU, it is not subject to the rules of the GDPR. Source: https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection&#
457.
by Boulth 8y ago
I think the parent means encrypt customer data with key specific to that customer. When you erase that customer key their data becomes irreversibly damaged.
458.
by Boulth 8y ago
Reading https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection/refo... I would agree, of course if that identifier is not in some other database, that maps it to a person. If you have just ids in a back
459.
by Boulth 8y ago
Could you link to these precedents? I'd like to read that in detail.
460.
by Boulth 8y ago
I believe the answer is embedded in the quote that you provided. Can you use the net to go back from weights to data? If not, then it's irreversible. On the other hand, as parent noticed, hashing IPs is not effective as it's possi
461.
by Boulth 8y ago
Is this book available somewhere? I tried this repo https://github.com/shoes/shoes-deprecated/downloads but github returns only 404.
462.
by Boulth 8y ago
Proxies are hardly new (2014?), well, just like Es6. There are some interesting applications [0] but I don't know if is use it in production. [0]: https://curiosity-driven.org/array-slices
463.
by Boulth 8y ago
Have you seen alternates? https://stackoverflow.com/questions/36123655/what-is-the-git...
464.
by Boulth 8y ago
> Server-side filtering of references I wonder if this will be somehow exposed by git daemon. It could be used for easy per ref access controls. For example Git Switch [0] that uses Macaroons had to clone the repository to implement per
465.
by Boulth 8y ago
How do you get these contracts accepted? According to https://curiosity-driven.org/bitcoin-contracts : > Transactions containing non-standard scripts like these will not be relied through the Bitcoin network but if they
466.
by Boulth 8y ago
> (even though meaningful use case is yet to be shown, but there is chance it will be found) One use case is having a repository UI completely in a browser so the backend can be a pure git server with no specialized backend code to displ
467.
by Boulth 8y ago
For Twitter third party clients are basically competition so it's not surprising that they make API access as limited as possible. Furthermore because of network effects they are not afraid that a significant number of people will leav
468.
by Boulth 8y ago
But it would help to run user content on user.foo.io just like Github.
469.
by Boulth 8y ago
Uhm, wait, did you just recommend Google with their automated support? Or does Google Domains have better support since you're paying? I'm genuinely curious about that.
470.
by Boulth 8y ago
I wonder how it works in practice. I've worked with git.js (old and ugly, but works) and js-git (looks nice but is quite complex). git.js even has a repository browsing demo (think gitk) that works in a browser. Did anyone use isomorph
471.
by Boulth 8y ago
Excellent post, reminds me of http://www.aleutia.com/products/r50-fanless-server
472.
by Boulth 8y ago
I'm not talking about boring technical info but user visible changes like easy image / file sharing, "X has read until this point..." etc. They are small changes and already present in proprietary solutions but for users
473.
by Boulth 8y ago
I wouldn't say XMPP did not change for 20 years, have you seen https://conversations.im/ ? Except voice / video (that I personally use rarely either way) I don't see any important modern feature missing.
474.
by Boulth 8y ago
Conversations.im does just that, uses FCM to get the messages in the background. They recently open sourced push server that interacts with FCM: https://github.com/iNPUTmice/p2
475.
by Boulth 8y ago
Excellent, thanks for the direct link to RFC!
476.
by Boulth 8y ago
Standard library is usually an implicit dependency. Which package manager makes you explicitly name and version std lib?
477.
by Boulth 8y ago
> this is a better solution than plain submodules, for many reasons; Transitive dependencies, diamond dependencies, semantic versionion, can't forget to submodule update --recursive, etc, etc. Well, one could argue that diamond depe
478.
by Boulth 8y ago
You can clone with submodules in one command: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3796927/how-to-git-clone... But I agree, maybe it should be turned on by default.
479.
by Boulth 8y ago
Zig is really interesting, and the explicit allocators is a feature I miss in many other system languages (like Rust). Presentation by the Zig author is a good introduction to the concept https://youtu.be/Z4oYSByyRak
480.
by Boulth 8y ago
I read the (now locked) thread, the way they handled the report leaves much to be desired.

More ›