BoiledCabbage

7 ms·

31.
by BoiledCabbage 3mo ago
> Capitalism does not guarantee competition (quite the opposite, strong property rights are the nexus of anticompetitive opportunity) which does not remove all profit over the long term, it squeezes it onto assets, which is where that un
32.
by BoiledCabbage 3mo ago
> I think it's just to hype Anthropic. What in the world?? When did HN lose all ability to think critically about anything?
33.
by BoiledCabbage 4mo ago
> Obviously their statements are insincere, because they are building the bloody things. If they were sincere that AI is like nuclear weapons, then they would be devoting all their cash and energy into lobbying the government to national
34.
by BoiledCabbage 4mo ago
> Your area again making the same mistake as before. > You are making the most passionate defense of team openai At no point did I mention Openai, referr to openai or imply anything about openai (just mentioned your reference). Nothin
35.
by BoiledCabbage 4mo ago
"You're on the team against me so I oppose everything you say". Again it's the same problem - what you're doing. I'm not on "team OpenAI". I'm also not on "team deepseek". I'm co
36.
by BoiledCabbage 4mo ago
"Don't you understand? I'm on team deepseek! It doesn't matter what's written about it. Heck it doesn't even matter if it's all lies - it supports my team and here's why I love my team."
37.
by BoiledCabbage 4mo ago
> So if a demographic group is more likely to apply to some jobs they are not qualified for, this paper would say they are being discriminated against. Your understanding appears to be incorrect. > Our research also found that this pa
38.
by BoiledCabbage 4mo ago
What is this nonsense? An AI generated article about single ai run test which in theory had many components and the AI judge declared deepseek "won"? How many runs were there on each test to account for some temperature variance?
39.
by BoiledCabbage 4mo ago
>> What was the common misconception? > That the rule change was a done deal. What are you talking about? The rule has already been changed in the NASDAQ. That makes it a done deal. Anything changed can always be undone, but to be
40.
by BoiledCabbage 4mo ago
So "unlimited" for you is literally one week more than 5 weeks tech companies cap at? Why not take 10 weeks or 12 weeks? If it's unlimited? And how many other employees are only taking half of what they would be taking becaus
41.
by BoiledCabbage 4mo ago
Yah this was the part that really threw me as well. "People would be pleased to have a rejection from us. They'd be proud to carry it sounds with them. Lucky them!" It's funny, I see an article from Yegge and thought &qu
42.
by BoiledCabbage 4mo ago
That's absurd thinking if putting in 6-8 hrs outta what everyone else is doing and what is needed to get you a job. For all its flaws, part of the benefit of an interview is it's time bound and equal for everyone. Similar to a tes
43.
by BoiledCabbage 4mo ago
I believe the answer is "yes, but..." Yes, but every every control flow statement in programming is more or less a fancy goto. If, do, while, for, try/catch, ...
44.
by BoiledCabbage 4mo ago
Using API or subscription?
45.
by BoiledCabbage 4mo ago
Man, maybe it's time for me to give the verge a subscription. There the only ones actually doing any journalism here and a bunch of AI blogs skimming off the top.
46.
by BoiledCabbage 4mo ago
You'd be shocked at how many people who work on ads really do delude themselves into thinking people find ads "useful". Their usual justification is in the end somewhere tied to "people click on ads so they must find the
47.
by BoiledCabbage 4mo ago
I couldn't write better satire if I tried: > A search through GPT‑5.5’s SFT data found many datapoints containing “goblin” and “gremlin.” Further investigation revealed a whole family of other odd creatures: raccoons, trolls, ogres,
48.
by BoiledCabbage 5mo ago
Nice to try something different. My feedback was it seemed like it was interesting to make, but for me at least not really interesting to solve. It felt more like solving two crosswords than a single combined one. Places where lots letters
49.
by BoiledCabbage 5mo ago
Yup, another failure of a policy. And again not a surprise, it was widely explained ahead of time they were illegal, but instead they were forced through under an "Emergency" situation and now enormous amount of money wasted and
50.
by BoiledCabbage 5mo ago
Normally I might dismiss a comment like this without much thought, but there is an evolutionary pressure that auto-updating AIs will experience for this type of behavior.
51.
by BoiledCabbage 6mo ago
Crypto is such a net negative for society. What cracks me up is how much crypto is emblematic of Libertarianism. Sounds promising if you think about it a superficially, but is obviously bad if you actually think about it in any real world t
52.
by BoiledCabbage 6mo ago
Buy his book - it's great and exactly like that. Domain Modeling Made Functional - Scott Wlaschin In the link above he's described 7 very practical ways to use it. No functional jargon, no mathematical jargon. Just practical use
53.
by BoiledCabbage 6mo ago
That assume a rule that wasn't state. You're assume if someone picks 'checkmate' and the next player picks 'check' the games is over and the checkmate selector loses. I assumed that it means you treat it like &
54.
by BoiledCabbage 6mo ago
> because small models found the same vulnerability. With a ton of extra support. Note this key passage: >We isolated the vulnerable svc_rpc_gss_validate function, provided architectural context (that it handles network-parsed RPC cre
55.
by BoiledCabbage 6mo ago
Yeah, but what stops P1 from DDos'ing and picking checkmate each time? If P2 picks check the first time, then they're done. At any point after if they pick checkmate, since P1 has checkmate selected they will reveal it and P2 will
56.
by BoiledCabbage 6mo ago
> Chris Tucker's character here isn't for everyone Yeah this comment to me is incredibly surprising. Chris Tucker played an absolutely incredible character in that movie. So creative, so well executed, so memorable. He was up t
57.
by BoiledCabbage 6mo ago
I believe this to be correct, where code and data are arguments consisting of binary trees constructed from pairs or can be 'nil: (define apply (lambda (code data) (match (code . data)
58.
by BoiledCabbage 6mo ago
I'm actually going to reply to myself with my understanding of what's written here as the more I've looked at it, the cooler I think it is. I happened to read this link [1], so that's what I'm basing it off of. Also
59.
by BoiledCabbage 6mo ago
This link below gives a better description of it, along with the definitions of the reduction rules. (which I got from further down in this thread) But what I believe was meant by the above was: "delta E1 E1" creates a new "r
60.
by BoiledCabbage 6mo ago
Just like AI comments are more human than any human could ever produce... /s

More ›