Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
BoiledCabbage
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
61.
▲
by
BoiledCabbage
6mo ago
Yah it was an extremely foolish and short sighted EO by Trump, and the country will pay for it for a long time.
62.
▲
by
BoiledCabbage
6mo ago
Agreed, truth tables one is important. But it's backwards, you test people on truth tables before teaching them. If someone is seeing this for the first time they may have never seen some of those gates and you quiz them. Then finally
63.
▲
by
BoiledCabbage
6mo ago
> But coding is solved? My belief, is the people who post this quote thinking it's some big win are the same people who are upset they can't post "stochastic parrot" anymore. And we all saw how that went.
64.
▲
by
BoiledCabbage
6mo ago
The article and people referenced within it say our universe is equivalent to being inside a black hole. Given their own description, wouldn't it be equivalent to being within a white hole? In anti-De Sitter space, all world lines conv
65.
▲
by
BoiledCabbage
7mo ago
So TotalEnergies agreed to invest 1 billion is offshore wind during thr last Administration. The current Administration doesn't want any investment in renewables so they attempted to block it. A judge said the attempted block was unlaw
66.
▲
by
BoiledCabbage
7mo ago
> Cameras are in fact the best deterrent. Kinda funny that your links don't support that. And I think that's exactly the issue. Doorbell cameras appear to be security theater when it comes to both trying to prevent or recoverin
67.
▲
by
BoiledCabbage
7mo ago
90% of those charts have no notable change or inflection point around 2012.
68.
▲
by
BoiledCabbage
7mo ago
> Depending on their agreements, you could argue it's a rented asset. Doesn't change any calculus. I think your mistakenly thinking of it as an asset. It's not as asset like a house, it's a service. They have a servic
69.
▲
by
BoiledCabbage
7mo ago
> Look I know it's an insane idea. I'm just curious what the most unhinged response to this might be. I mean what if all the employees stripped off their clothes and walked through the streets naked while barking, then called u
70.
▲
by
BoiledCabbage
7mo ago
So they agreed to the exact same clauses that Anthropic put forward but with OpenAI instead? So it wasn't about those principles making them a supply chain risk? They're just trying to punish Anthropic for being the first ones to
71.
▲
by
BoiledCabbage
8mo ago
Because Anthropic has never claimed that code is free? It's pretty easy to argue your point if you pick a strawman as your opponent. They have said that you can be significantly more productive (which seems to be the case for many) and
72.
▲
by
BoiledCabbage
8mo ago
What? This is the most convoluted theory I think anyone could imagine. And it seems like it was only posted to distract from the most obvious: Someone in the President's circle is secretely communicating with (or compromised by) a fore
73.
▲
by
BoiledCabbage
8mo ago
> I think what we have is mostly AGI. I agree that the term AGI is the problem. If I have something as intelligent as a mouse that should be AGI, if I have something a intelligent as a bird that should be AGI. Same is it's as intell
74.
▲
by
BoiledCabbage
8mo ago
Maybe I'm missing the point as well, but what did it do wrong? It seemed like you wanted to see if a search tool was working. It looked to see. It tried one search using on data source KJ and found no matches. Next question would be i
75.
▲
by
BoiledCabbage
9mo ago
What a terrible reply to an interesting and genuine comment. > but this is such a perplexing comment. There is nothing perplexing about the comment it's extremely straightforward. > You... seem to be upset that it leaves out som
76.
▲
by
BoiledCabbage
9mo ago
The fact that people look to start a business based on searching foe a moat shows they don't believe in free markets. As well as shows what's wrong with Silicon Valley.
77.
▲
by
BoiledCabbage
9mo ago
> in the early 80's, a time when you basically had to invent everything from scratch, so certainly there is no mental block to having to do so, and I'm aware there is at least a generation of developers that grew up with stack
78.
▲
by
BoiledCabbage
9mo ago
Thanks, while we in the end may not agree - I do feel I understand your thinking now. Also agreed, we've probably reached the fruitful end of this discussion and this will be my last reply on it. I'll explain my thoughts similarly
79.
▲
by
BoiledCabbage
9mo ago
I appreciate you sharing your thinking. I think it's reasonable to state that at the moment Opus 4.5 is the best coding model. Definitely debatable, but at least I don't think it controversial to argue that, so we'll start th
80.
▲
by
BoiledCabbage
9mo ago
> It is embarrassing to restrict an open source tool that is (IMO) a strictly and very superior piece of software from using your model. > Shutting down the other tool, if that's what's in fact happening, is what is embarras
81.
▲
by
BoiledCabbage
9mo ago
> Anyway, this is embarrassing for Anthropic. Why? A few times in this thread I hear people saying "they shouldn't have done this" or something similar but not given any reason why. Listing features you like of another pro
82.
▲
by
BoiledCabbage
9mo ago
> IDK if Anthropic wants to offer a service at below cost, I don't think they should gate keep which client you access that service over. Are you going to say why you think they shouldn't? You didn't give a reason.
83.
▲
by
BoiledCabbage
9mo ago
> I just took delivery a few months ago of some handmade solid cherry bookshelves. Was the seller of that furniture the number one furniture retailer in the world? The majority of furniture purchased is flat pack. Which means the majorit
84.
▲
by
BoiledCabbage
9mo ago
> (This is one of the reasons why only the economically illiterate would propose a tax on "unrealized capital gains": that means taxing people for income they have not actually received, but merely could theoretically receive.
85.
▲
by
BoiledCabbage
9mo ago
That's what so surprising to me - they data clearly shows the experiment had terrible results. And the write up is nothing but the author stating: "glowing success!". And they didn't even bother to test the most importan
86.
▲
by
BoiledCabbage
9mo ago
It's incredible there is something wrong with a group of people completely unable to see when someone is lying to them. And no matter how many times they are lied to, as long as they are rich enough they believe them. I don't know
87.
▲
by
BoiledCabbage
9mo ago
The whole mocks, fakes and the rest were always a terrible idea. Although people didn't realize it st the time, they were a band-aid to try to make poorly architected code testable. 90% of the time, needing to use a mock is one of the
88.
▲
by
BoiledCabbage
9mo ago
> It's really common for people with sudden windfalls to lose it all. 5% of people isn't "really common". Estimate of 1% of US adults declare bankruptcy within a 5 year period (based on ending in July 2025 and right n
89.
▲
by
BoiledCabbage
10mo ago
> I'd assumed HN skewed heavily technical but seeing 1984, Dune, and Foundation in the top mentions suggests the community has broader reading habits than stereotypes suggest. Seeing 1984, Dune, Foundation as the top fiction is abo
90.
▲
by
BoiledCabbage
10mo ago
What agent framework are you using? It can differ from one to the next on the same model.
More ›